1. Home
  2. Question details

Self-media circle's 'scrubbing controversy' escalates with each other, what do you think of each of Liushen Leilei and Zhou Chong?

Self-media circle's 'scrubbing controversy' escalates with each other, what do you think of each of Liushen Leilei and Zhou Chong?

Many say the first snowfall of 2018 in the new media industry is more worth brushing off than this first snowfall in the South: the washout controversy.

In the past two years, there's been a distinct feeling that the washout controversy is growing, why?

To a large extent, it is related to the introduction of the "original function" of WeChat public number.

Originally, there is no such thing as a wash, most of them are copied, taken over as they are, without signing the author's name, or signing their own names directly (this is relatively rare); now it is "wash" or "collage", change and process a little.

That's why people are saying that plagiarism is a thing of the past and copywriting is a thing of the present and future, and that textual infringement has come to the "age of copywriting".

Why is the washing of manuscripts getting worse? I think there are two reasons, driven by both pressure and profit.

Let's start with the pressure. The main culprit is the "daily shift", a platform led by WeChat, which allows new content to be updated once a day.

It can be challenging for any person or organization to maintain a constant stream of high quality content output for a long period of time.

Even though one's talent is outstanding, if one has to write a beautiful article every day, it will drain the writer's energy in a constant stream over time.

At this point, "washing articles" has become a relatively easy way out.

But you can't rely on the "daily shift" even if you've washed your hands of it, you can choose not to do it.

There is a second reason: the profit motive. The day shift itself is also a kind of interest-driven, but I would say that the direct interest-driven: with the new media advertising offer is getting higher and higher, a push can earn tens of thousands or even more than 100,000, a lot of original creators can not resist such a huge temptation.

Many new media organizations also wash their manuscripts. A very important reason is that the content of this craft, look at the market, the top talent across the board so much, they do not have to perch in a certain organization, most of them go it alone.

New media organizations can recruit editors with a certain level of competence, but they lack top talent, and in order to produce a steady stream of high-quality content, profit-driven, article washing naturally becomes a shortcut.

It is this situation that has gradually turned manuscript washing into a behavior that the industry has acquiesced in, condoned, and even encouraged, creating an environment in which bad money drives out good money.

So often people are suffering, especially those who do not have many fans of the trumpet author, can only complain: their hard work original no one to see, whoever washed my manuscript immediately 10w +.

I also suffered a lot, I in the headline number every post, that is, by the hundred number to copy. Their plagiarism seems to be a team, every day a number to copy, every day a different number, very team, at first I also went to sue, but useless. The worst thing about them is that they use other people's text, but also said that they have authorized them to send, too disgusting.

However the other party did not respond to the email and did not take down the article.

I think Zhou Chong is quite funny, at least you are a super size, how can you not even quarrel?

Six God Leilei originally did not say that Zhou Chong's number of plagiarism and plagiarism, Zhou Chong to get an appraisal certificate to prove that he "did not copy, much less plagiarism", which is obviously not the right goods ah.

Six god lei lei said is "wash", this "wash" is the original text is disassembled and then reorganize the modification, like a twin brother, but each paragraph and words and phrases and the original text in the form of expression of the difference, you not only can not be through the weight of the search software to determine that they are in the infringing You not only can not search software through the check to determine that they are infringing on the copyright, and even more so through the copyright law and other laws and regulations, to pursue the other party's legal responsibility.

Regarding what is "article laundering" and how he encountered "article laundering", I think the original article written by Six Gods Leilei has already written it very clearly, and it is also convincing enough. Whether Zhou Chong's number washed Sixth God's article or not, anyone with some writing skills and experience would be able to tell.

As for Zhou Chong, it seems unnecessary for her to sell her good behavior again after getting a bargain. I just read her response article, explaining that this article is the author's contribution, and published the editing and reading of the emails exchanged, but also their own number on the text, and the six God Leilei original text in accordance with the subheading one by one, and still insist that there is no plagiarism and plagiarism, this time the response is very feeble:

First, the author contributes, but the number is your number, and even if you lose sight of it before publishing the push, it doesn't mean you're blameless, and you can't use it as a way to dislike the original author, Rokugan;

Secondly, the author of the article on Zhouchong's number, Xie Wenjuan, and the editor's communication prior to the release of the article do not have any logical relationship with whether the article has been shuffled or not, and the only thing that it can prove is who the responsible person is, and that the editorial department did not intentionally try to shuffle the article prior to the release of the article;

Thirdly, Zhou Chong's practice of proving innocence by comparing the original text of the Six Gods with his own allegedly laundered text one by one in accordance with the subheadings can only cajole laymen who do not understand the article, because this is still a method of identifying plagiarism and plagiarism, and it is not suitable for laundering the article.

The latest news is that Six Gods has issued another article criticizing Zhou Chong. Self-media circle is originally a mixed rivers and lakes, a lot of big numbers rely on copying, plagiarism, title party and other practices, monthly income of tens of thousands or even more than a hundred thousand, has been an open secret. I hope that Zhou Chong is not this kind of number, but this time this thing, her response to the right and left, avoiding the important and light, but also emotional burst, it is a bit of a pity.

Almost everyone who codes has a bloody history of being plagiarized and shuffled around.

I'm no exception, and when I see this issue, it's so nameless that I don't know how to indict this phenomenon for a while. I'll talk about it briefly, on several levels.

I. What is plagiarism? It's a thief. A thief.

The Internet era, especially the WeChat era, has brought about the payment for content and the fan economy, which are the direct cause of today's plagiarism phenomenon.An author, to original a slightly better content, not only need to accumulate over the years, but also need to do a lot of homework, but also take the time to write out, is very time-consuming and energy-consuming things. And what about plagiarism and shuffling, just paste and copy.

So, plagiarism is thievery and very bad behavior.

Whether it's my own articles being plagiarized or I see a friend's being plagiarized, I don't hesitate to retweet and spread the word and report it for that very reason.

In my opinion, the so-called shuffling, etc., is plagiarism, a concentrated different case of plagiarism:

One is direct plagiarism. This kind is the most straightforward, take someone else's stuff, sign their name directly to it as their own achievement, and take it to sell it for money and fame.

The second is the washout. This most insidious. Bring the articles of several people, and copy a little from the East and a little from the West. Or change someone's sentence to a different expression or a different word. For example, if the original text reads "Xiang Yu killed himself on the banks of the Wujiang River", the draft can be changed to "Xiang Yu killed himself on the banks of the Wujiang River." This is just a simple example. The actual situation is more complicated.

The third is stolen citations, which are also common.You wrote an article, quoted some foreign or ancient words, the plagiarist himself does not read, do not check the information, copy your quotes, even your source of reference also copied, the beautiful name: I am from the open publication of the quote, so why say I plagiarism?

The fourth is unauthorized reprinting, which is the most cocksure of all.Some public numbers, headlines, and Douban's online articles, given the high cost of plagiarism, especially for some new media that already have some followers and influence, plagiarism will bring about great reputational damage, they will take other people's articles and use them, where is the byline still the original author, but neither will they contact the original author for authorization to use them; and much less will they pay for the articles.When the original author sees it, gets upset and comes to us, these shameless new media will still say, "I've given you my byline, what more do you want? Why don't we help you spread your influence?And so on.

But.Many authors, who simply can't see some silly new media, don't want these people to help proliferate it! Besides, reprints that don't even talk about article fees are just hooliganism!

This unauthorized and unpaid new media that thinks it's contributing to the author, by analogy, is what this looks like:

You're walking down the street, and this really ugly, really nasty guy suddenly strips naked and leans over you, and you yell, "What the hell! Get away from me!" And he says, "What's wrong? I'm naked, what else do you want?

Second, why is there so much plagiarism and script washing now? What are the reasons?

As I said earlier.The direct reason is that in the new media environment, if you are popular and have a fan base, then you can cash in, you can make money, and you can become famous.

After so many years of the Internet, there have beenSome of those who became popular by plagiarism and fraud back in the day have now cleaned up their act, set up companies, and participated in some entertainment talk shows, ostentatiously educating others about morality on the Internet and in videos.

It's hilarious, ironic, and egregious.

But the reason is more than that:The fundamental reason is the incorrect values of the whole society at present. The logic of the society nowadays is that: if you have money, you are a successful person, and if you are successful, you are considered capable and competent, and those who are competent are also worshipped and admired by others.

So.Some people are not ashamed of stealing for money and fame, they are investing in it.

In addition, as far as plagiarism of articles is concerned, there is another layer of reasons, that is, China from the government agencies, to the institutions, to the enterprises are not uncommon in the mountain of literature. Let's take a look at the Selected Works of Mao, which are all written by Mao himself; and then look at the present, a section or division level sesame seed official has to write all kinds of materials, and the materials can't be finished, so he can only go and copy them.

Third, how to prevent your articles from being plagiarized and stolen?

In this situation where there are laws that are not enforced, and where the various original platforms are poorly rooted and prevented, it tends to happen:The person who plagiarizes is high and mighty, with a face that says "copying you is for your own good"; the person who is copied has to work hard to prove his case, spend a lot of time looking for evidence, and spend money to hire an attorney if there is a lawsuit.

What is even more desperate is that the fans of those plagiarizers often go on to abuse and mob the victims of the plagiarism, saying that they are rubbing it in, that they are hype, and that it is simply impossible to find any justification in heaven.

Honestly, if I had the power, I would execute all plagiarizers and confiscate the property of those who applauded plagiarizers.

But pathetically, it's now up to you to barely make some measure of it:

One seeks original protection from the platform, this is legally justifiable, doudoune moncler outlet, headlines are still available now, as long as the evidence is strong, you can still receive some results;

Secondly, you should pay more attention and keep evidence in your own time., when I cite a document, I often intentionally differ the page number of the source by one or two pages, or I intentionally write fewer or more words when I cite it. That way, if someone else plagiarizes my citation, I definitely have the evidence to prove it.

Third, try to write in your own style, this one is only in my literature category, and this kind is the highest requirement for gaining recognition. I'm not there yet either, it's kind of a work in progress.

Fourthly, if I catch anyone plagiarizing, I will pursue them relentlessly and will not let them go, and I will have to cross them.Even though I am a writer, I have a social identity and I have my own weapons and resources in society. At the moment, I haven't personally encountered such a blatant plagiarist, butMy friend had been plagiarized, and in the end, thanks to our efforts, the plagiarist had to cancel his number, which had been operating for years, from a platform, with all his fans lost; his book, which was involved in the plagiarism, was taken off the shelves of the publisher, recalled, and destroyed, with all the manuscript fees lost; and the book's editors and publisher publicly apologized, with all his reputation lost.

The contradiction between the two will not be commented on here, everyone's eyes are discerning, and it is very clear which is right and which is wrong.

Here I would like to talk about a related matter. In the article of Six God Leilei, he mentioned a large number of "picking up the pieces" that had been scrubbed by Zhou:

It's interesting to note that "Pick Up the Pieces", as the party being scrubbed, is also a good at scrubbing itself. I myself am a victim of this. I published a feature article "GAI: Hip Hop Gangster" in the November 2017 issue, which was plagiarized by "Pick Up the Pieces". Here's a comparison for your viewing pleasure:

My article:

"Picking up the pieces" of the shuffle:

To describe this behavior as a wash is an exaggeration, all the author of this article had to do was copy and paste the article directly, hit enter to break the line, and change the wording a little bit.

Weekly rinse drafts, many of which are partial washes. And this article is copied almost in its entirety.

A couple more comparison charts:

My article:

Gleanings:

My article:

Gleanings:

My article:

Gleanings:

My article:

Gleanings:

Blah blah blah carryover all over this public article with 17,000+ likes (that's likes, not reads). Screenshots are just too tiring, so I'll just post those above.

In order to write this report, I spent two whole months, from GAI just participated in the program soon has been tracked until he got the championship into the mainstream music market, interviewed four or five times, went to Chongqing, Weiyuan, interviewed nearly twenty around the interviewee. As a result, the "pick up" copied the past broken line, change the words and sentences, easily read a million plus. Such a phenomenon is really reasonable? Such shameless behavior should not bear the price? I can understand the feelings of six god lei lei.

Another point I would like to make is that, in this incident between Six God Leilei and Zhou Chong, does the platform side also have an unshirkable responsibility? Zhou Chong is not the only one who washed articles without any fear. What kind of creative environment provides the soil for the evil doers?

谢邀.

Six gods of both articles read, noon hand itching, did not resist, went to restore Zhou Chong, in short: a quite beautiful, but grew up inside the gloomy, very low self-esteem and very strong girl, limited by the structure of knowledge and vision, the last stall is too big, she is a little unable to hold up, and crossed the line.

The following is a long post, so be prepared haha.

In the play Thunderstorm, there is a big rascal named Zhou Puyuan, who has two sons, the younger of whom is named Zhou Chong.

He has an impassioned confession, "I think I was like a small sailboat light as a petrel on a winter's morning, very bright in the sky, on an infinite sea oh, when the sea wind was blowing tight, and the air on the sea smelled a little fishy, a little salty, and the white sails were spread out full, and like an eagle's wings clinging to the sea they flew, and flew, and flew toward the sky. Ahead is our world."

In Mr. Cao Yu's writing, Zhou Chong is the sunrise, he is childish, innocent and kind, which is almost a perfect child. But his father, Zhou Puyuan, said he was a half-bottle of vinegar thought, and his mother, Fan Yi, said he was a little sheep.

And that's tragic. When he doesn't meet a better mentor at an age when he knows how to love, the only thing the brooding family can rebel against is death.

Thunderstorm was written in 1933, and was staged many times by Beijing Human Art in the 1950s, then in the years of turmoil, the performances were suspended, and it was not until 1999 that it was re-staged by Beijing Human Art. However, in 1984, a movie version was made by Shanghai Film, with Sun Daolin directing and acting.

So it seems that in 1983, in a village in the mountainous area of northwest Gan, after the birth of a girl child, her father named him Zhou Chong, it is a complete coincidence, and "Thunderstorm" has nothing to do with it.

But since it's a coincidence, we can tell a story. Mang loves to tell stories.

The male Zhouchong in Thunderstorm didn't get to fly out, but this female Zhouchong from Wuning County, Jiujiang, Jiangxi Province, dreams of flying high.

As an adult, she half-joked to her friend, "Come to your earth for a little fun."

I don't know if my friend's reply was secretly sarcastic, but he said, "Welcome to the world, and if you feel good, don't go back to the fairy world!"

Zhou Chong was very unhappy before he became an adult.

She later described it as such in an article:

"I've lost count of the number of fights my father had with my mother, except that the memory of that impoverished home at the bottom of the Makubu Mountains brings an outpouring of curse after curse, wail after wail ......."

"In the midst of all that pain that played out close to home day after day, I nurtured my desires ruthlessly, nurtured them big and fat: escape, escape! Escape from the family."

She both sympathizes with and resents her mother, and has a strong resentment and rebellion against her own family.

Fortunately, she also has a good grandfather, the collection of books in the countryside is considered more, although most of the "Zhou Yi", "Analects" and other threadbare books, but there is also easy to understand "said Yue Quanzhuan".

In fourth grade, she stole the book and read it, realizing that there was such an interesting world beyond the closed village.

It should be to the first year, after learning "Mulan", the teacher asked us to expand the scene of the battlefield. Zhou Chong imitated "Yue Quanzhuan", wrote more than ten pages, the big background and small details superimposed, killing and ambiguous entanglement, got the teacher's "repeated praise".

This incident planted a seed in Zhou Chong's heart: imitation is the initial start of the road of literature.

Teenage Chou-Chou certainly doesn't know that 20 years later, parody has a new phrase: washout!

Imitation makes you better, and washing makes you rich.

She also finished reading the Sutra of the Mountains and Seas with her grandfather's encouragement and introduction to more fairy tales, novels and essays. This sweet and honorable old man passed away in 2005.

Grandpa may have been the only bright spot in Zhou Chong's somber youth.

Zhou Chong's Baidu encyclopedia profile after his rise to fame is that he graduated from the School of International Education at Jiangxi Normal University.

But Mang examined a bit, this is a secondary college, training-oriented, with little relationship with the Jiangxi Normal University headquarters. And Zhou Chong belongs to further training, according to this judgment, she should be a secondary school teacher graduated, and then divided back to his hometown in the town, became a language teacher.

He went to school to become a teacher, and this was the "system" that Zhou Chong later read about, which the uninformed would think was a prominent government agency.

She teaches town middle school, is also the school she went to school, "full of school deceased, have from the former teacher, into today's colleagues, meet do not know how to greet, well it is not a big deal. Embarrassed, apprehensive, slowly natural."

She later confessed that thinking about that place was more, well, heartfelt revulsion than literary nostalgia. "The only celebration was that every year, at the first sign of winter vacation, the school would kill all the pigs raised in the cafeteria. Each teacher would share a piece of meat, ten or so pounds, fat and lean, split equally between the lower water and the ribs, and carry the blood-splattered sling home with gusto."

She resented the stubbornly anti-intellectual ethos of the townships, where teachers, in groups of three or five, set up a card game and spent no time at all in mah-jongg or poker.

Zhou Chong wanted to escape, but there was nowhere to escape to. To pass the mediocre days, she continued to read and often went book shopping, which is a slightly better memory.

Many years later, she also told her hometown press, rather smugly, that because she had been buying more books, she once went back to a familiar bookstore, and the owner, a young man, said, 'From now on, you don't have to pay for any of the books you buy.' She asked why, 'Because I think you're nice, and girls who like to read have a transcendent soul!'

"There is a transcendent soul!"' What next for the woman of

Participate in beauty pageants! Zhou Chong became the winner of the first "Bank of China Cup" ambassador contest in Wuning.

Compared to her literary talent, Mango is still more interested in the beauty pageant champion, deliberately to seek confirmation, to Mango's straight aesthetic, it is not really good to say one, two, three, just quote a few sentences of her friend's comments.

She was in Wuning, a literary friend so described: "Born in the eighties, she was tall, face like a full moon, eye like a star, can be said to be Jiangnan beauty. 2004 she won the Wuning County Ambassadors Competition Champion, is well deserved. You say how beautiful she is, one day, she combed her hair in the washroom on the fifth floor of her house, downstairs the car parked in a row, just to see her slim out of the hand."

I'm afraid this is a bit exaggerated, literati, always love to overstate the case. By the way, Zhou Chong had also criticized this literary friend, "Read little, love to be a good old man."

Aesthetics vary from person to person, but Jiangxi is also a place of beauty, I think Zhou Chong is still quite touching, and then also the name of the beautiful writer wandering in the sea of literature.

A fair lady, a gentleman's man. Not to mention the beauty pageant champion, there should be quite a lot of people pursuing her then.

After reading more books and becoming more emotionally delicate, it was natural for Zhou Chong to fall in love. The experience, by and large, is sore and unpleasant, as can be seen in the reactions of those around her in her writing.

The father hissed at her, "You are a disgrace to our family, a disgrace!" And probably hit her.

A respected cousin commented to her in front of others, "Too stubborn to live only in her own world!"

A coworker advised her, "You've made too many enemies, watch that word tree!"

A woman with the face of a corpse said in a loud voice, "Flies don't bite seamless eggs!"

There must have been so much hurt and naysaying that to this day Chou-Chou holds a grudge, believing that there are blank stares all around.

Huang Shujun said that genius is afraid of not being genius enough, but there is nowhere to escape.

The beautiful Zhou Chong is very bitter ah, "I because of a love that should not have, threw himself into a situation of notoriety . ...... Many nights, I trembled in the closed room and said to myself: stay no more, no more!"

In 2006, Zhou Chong did the formalities, to go to the International College of Jiangxi Normal University in Nanchang for further study.

Nanchang, the city of heroes, became her place of refuge. She stayed here for two years, but it was a struggle to learn, "Then I gradually skipped classes because my English background was too weak ...... to be alone, as has been the habit for many years ...... for a person who has an excess of emotion and time, writing is the best masturbation. writing is the best masturbation."

A friend encouraged her to write!

These words ignited the fire of Zhou Chong, a rural junior high school language teacher. Since then, her words have been scattered in Mountain Flower, Yellow River Literature, Works, Starburst, World Literature and Art, Deer Song, Northern Literature, Anhui Literature, Creative Commentary, Prose Era, Writers and Readers, Foshan Literature and Art, Sprout, Literature and Life, Hundred Flowers, Prose Perspectives, and Working People.

Two years later, Zhou Chong returned home from Nanchang, although still junior high school teachers, but has become famous, but also joined the Jiangxi Provincial Writers' Association, more calls about the manuscript.

A late night, a literary publication editor called, call, heard the dog barking, asked her, how there is the sound of the dog. She said, small town.

The editor pauses for a moment, then tells her that to be better, she needs to get out of town.

After the call, Zhou Chong wandered around the playground for a long time, the streetlights were yellow and lost, the four fields were silent, she felt lonely, "I think, I want to leave!"

There are only two ways for a small-town teacher to be transferred back to the county: one is to take an exam, and the other is to have a backstage. The exams are too intense, and the backstage is not.

Fortunately, Zhou Chong can write. In 2009, she was transferred back from the town of Wuning County (later changed to the city) of the city investment company, is the government's financing department, specializing in Wuning all kinds of infrastructure construction to find the money, but also tube project construction. After she went, was supposed to write materials, did not expect a word can not write, so sit in the office, not long after, and because of personnel changes, do the cashier.

She later recalled the experience, saying that she had seen corruption and injustice, was deeply powerless, had no courage to resist, and wanted to escape.

Writing is a great craft.

Xiao Hong, a young woman from Northeast China, was recognized by Lu Xun, a big man in the literary world, because she could write, and has since become a beautiful writer. Jiangxi young woman Zhou Chong because she can write, was recommended by the Jiangxi Provincial Literature Federation, to go to the Lu Xun College of Literature to study.

Lu Xun is really a blessing for young women in literature, but young women in literature are not willing to share it. Later, Zhou Chong wrote an article scolding Xiao Hong, calling her a "starving bitch".

In 2011, Zhou Chong came to Beijing, the members of this class are Jiangxi writers, strong sense of nostalgia, the Imperial City is so big, she opened her eyes.

In addition to her talent, her beauty is still unforgettable to her classmates.

After Zhou Chong's book was published, the writer Liu Jianhua also wrote a reminiscence: "I liked Zhou Chong initially because of her impeccable beauty. Zhou Chong's beauty can't be compared, and certainly can't be categorized. She is pure but not hibiscus, fragrant but not peony; she is guilty of being thorny and poisonous, but she is by no means a rose or poppy. Zhou Chong's beauty makes both rhetoric and statistics very difficult, and is therefore even more powerful and lethal, both to men and women.

With her talent and looks, the teachers at the academy looked at her differently and paid close attention to her growth. At the end of her studies, she was dressed in a red dress, which was very eye-catching.

The killing power of beautiful writers on greasy middle-aged men in the circle has never been fatal, and it is no wonder that a few years later, when Zhou Chong released his book, a group of male Vs lined up to praise it and write favorable reviews. Several of them are also so-called thinkers, and Mang is ashamed of them when he thinks about it.

Zhou Chong himself said, "It was really a period of life on the clouds. The environment and the people, both deep in my heart ...... Beijing is so nice, you see everyone's topic, and the county, completely different!"

Something else happened that year that had a profound effect on her.

Zhou Chong pulled out his savings, bought a suite for his mother, and then traveled to Lhasa, just like thousands and thousands of female literati, to purify the mind and leave their souls in Lhasa.

A few years later, on the stage of "Very Do Not Disturb", a female guest said, "Because I just especially want to go to Tibet, so I just feel that Tibet is, in my heart, a particularly beautiful place, it is a place to purify the soul."

The venomous bald host Meng Fei took over, "It's useless to go anywhere if that heart of yours is really dirty, you know? There are a lot of things you go and see before you draw conclusions. I think it's especially creepy that after a trip to Lijiang you don't want to work, and after a trip to Tibet you have to leave the house, I don't think it's advisable for people with such a mind to go out, just surf the internet at home, it's fine."

Zhou Chong is not a matchmaking girl, and she also despises matchmaking extremely in her article, but she's in agreement with the matchmaking girl who doesn't want to work.

Being a celebrity in the county, the county secretary and governor of the county personally overhauled her transfer order, allowing her to choose any one of the cultural bureau, television station, or education department.

Zhou Chong chose Wuning No. 2 Middle School. She felt that firstly, she had a vacation, secondly, she could deal less with adults, and thirdly, she was idealistic, "What can change the mind of a nation is media and education."

At Wuning No. 2 Middle School, she teaches two classes of language, both first years, each with 60 or 70 students, "like an ant nest."

Chou Chong was known to her students as Old Chou. About how her class lecture, now no record found. On the contrary, a student recalled, "Having taught me language for a year, I still remember one time when so many students in the class didn't write their homework, she threw their schoolbags down one by one." "A rabbit on the outside, a lion on the inside."

Maybe her whole focus was on writing at the time, and she was also blogging about school, which drew some hostility.

"Sitting in my office, some old woman rushes over and rips into me. Says, what are you babbling about? And cursing, what a bullshit beautiful writer."

"The principal came in for a talk and said, don't talk bad about the school, promote positive energy."

Zhou Chong also looks down on his colleagues, "The teachers are ignorant and old-fashioned, and they are not much different from the former town high school."

In the summer of 2013, she traveled alone with a backpack through five provinces - Xinjiang, Shaanxi, Inner Mongolia, Guizhou and Yunnan - before finally stopping in Dali, "unwilling to go any further and not wanting to go back."

Everywhere she went, she left a lot of photos of herself, watching from her expression, extremely letting go.

Traveling back to the winter, Jiangxi Province, engaged in a young writers after 80 rewriters will be, Zhou Chong also participated.

She lived with a female writer named Lin Shan, and one morning they sat shoulder to shoulder, on the bus from the hotel to the College of Arts and Letters, the sun warming the windows.

Zhou Chong touched Lin Shan with his elbow and asked, "Do you still believe in love?"

Lindsay said, "Believe."

Whether Zhou Chong believed it or not is unknown, because there is no context. However, a few years later, her husband bought her Haagen-Dazs, and she would go to the circle of friends to bask in her happiness.

In 2014, Zhou Chong published her first collection of essays, You Deserve a Better World, and has since become an iconic figure among the country's beautiful writers.

With a reputation for writing and traveling around to purify his soul, Zhou Chong wants to escape again.

You see, escape seems to be the theme of her life.

Zhou Chong had claimed that Zhou's women, water-based, easy to feel and easy to hurt.

It is a dragon that should be coiled, a tiger that should be lying down, and water that should flow, of course.

In March 2015, Zhou Chong resigned from Wuning No. 2 Middle School, and later circulated a resignation letter with only twenty-eight words. She deliberately emphasized "leaving the system" to show her determination.

At this time she should have the heart, published a book, or bestseller, sold hundreds of thousands of copies. At this time she also has the bottom of the air, caught up with a "content hungry" era, people who can write have the opportunity to become a big V.

Zhou Chong went to Guangzhou, became a full-time "public dog", and soon killed a piece of heaven and earth in the more than 20 million public numbers, bursting articles frequently.

I have to admit, she's a hard worker, "ordering takeout for lunch in order to write, only remembering to pick it up at the door in the evening. When I had my period, I only changed my tampon once a day."

Of course the income is amazing, she earns a million dollars a month and buys a house and car in Guangzhou. At the end of 2016, she said her 2017 wish was to earn ten million dollars a year. Perhaps at that moment, she remembered the man who beat her years ago, her mother's long years of illness, and a student who said, "What a fool, not to do a job with such a high salary and come to teach!"

She finally experienced the sense of accomplishment that comes with wealth. But writing needs persistence, and more importantly, accumulation. Writing every day, there is always a time of depletion, and the fans may be lost as soon as the public number stops, so what to do?

She claims to have read a lot of books, even "a book in two days", covering almost all disciplines of humanities and social sciences.

But it has to be said that either her talent is limited or she laps it up, and her interpretations always run uncontrollably down the chicken-soup route, and in many cases are even more off-topic.

Mango is not talented and will give you an example.

In her essay "Larry the Wobbly", she talks about her love of reading Maugham's books, and says that "Larry" of Blade is her spiritual idol, "repeatedly touched by the protagonist, and filled with a sense of happiness", and that "the reason why Larry traveled between different The reason why Larry travels between different places and cultures is because he is searching for something, maybe an answer, maybe a question other than a question. Yet I don't care if he has found it. To me, the experience is itself."

What about actuality? In the novel, Larry works as an airman in World War I. After witnessing the death of his best friend and doubting his life, he gives up his job in finance after the war and embarks on a journey to find the meaning of life. When reading fails to provide answers, he travels, and when Europe doesn't work, he goes to India, where he meets a Hindu guru and finally enters some kind of enlightened state in his practice. After returning to China, Larry gave up his privileged life and became a cab driver, just to keep the quietness of the soul.

书中有一场景很打动人,是拉里离开德国某修道院时,对神父道歉,神父回答道:“No. You are a deeply religious man who doesn’t believe in God. God will seek you out。 You'll come back. Whether here or elsewhere only God can tell.”

How well said! But it is clearly the base of the palace imperial food, froze by Zhou Chong interpreted the flavor of thirteen spices.

Reading is too tiring. Even if you read a book in two days, you can't write an article a day.

In the words of another self media V, Six God Leilei, Zhou Chong began to wash her articles. In short, when she saw good articles and good ideas from other public organizations, she appropriated them, and of course changed them. Other people say "happy", she said "excited". When people say "I have an intern", she says "I have friends".

Zhou Chong responds that Six God Lei Lei bullied her and denigrated her, and she's going to hold him accountable.

This puts the reporter born six god lei lei agitation of fire, the second time to send an article to tear.

The gods are fighting, the kids are watching. the first snow of 2018 just fell in a flurry.

Thinking about it is really sad. More than 20 million public numbers, adhere to the original only a few, are copying, but also copied into a big V.

Zhou Chong last year, the second book "I prefer to work hard for themselves", which is an inspirational book, we have to self-love, we all desire to be loved, but only independent people, know how to love their own people can get love, no one can not be the salvation of anyone who fails in life.

It's a strong taste of chicken soup, but her fans just love it, commenting on Douban, "I love how the whole books tell us truths that have long since rotted on Main Street."

This is what the majority of fans are like ah, what else can be done? Other than letting Zhou Chong's wallet get bigger and bigger and his temper get bigger and bigger.

When a fan commented that she was taking a lot of ads, she shot back and said, "Did you reward me? If you didn't, who are you to talk about me?

Beautiful writers have stopped trying to portray human nature and are now trying to exploit it.

Those cooks and complainers in the first and second tier cities, as well as female literati in the third and fourth tier cities, try to find similar images from her and comfort themselves. But in her eyes, her fans are just mole crickets that build her a tower of wealth, and she says bluntly in her circle of friends, "Keep two sentences in mind: 1, he who gets losers gets the world; 2, instead of educating idiots, it's better to make money from idiots."

After becoming a big V, New List once interviewed her and asked her how she felt about outsiders comparing her to Mimoun.

She said the two were different, and that she had a sort of anachronistic literary complex.

Well, she has been a self-proclaimed literati since. In another interview a few years ago, she also borrowed from Zweig and said that more important than knowledge is love and compassion.

But in her first book, that's what it says:

"I remember a time when my mother slipped on the well platform and cried out in pain with a crooked mouth, I stood motionless, watched her curl up, watched her push up her pants leg to verify the blood was raging, watched her angrily curse me for being a cassava-stupid, bitchy whore, watched her departing deserted well platform being illuminated by the setting sun in jagged diagonal shadows without a trace of shame in my heart, and I had long ago made an oath in my heart that if I ever became like my mother. I vowed in my heart long ago that if I became like my mother, I would surely die. But then I sadly realized that the violence in my nature is deeply rooted, it lurks in my body, silent ......"

It seems that neither Zhou Chong in "Thunderstorm" nor the beautiful writer Zhou Chong has been able to fly out after all. The former is trapped in the patriarchal system, and the latter in greed and anger.

Zhou Chong this statement is so strange ah, six gods did not say that you plagiarized, said you wash the manuscript, your entire legal identification out why?

Frankly, the evidence of unauthorized reproduction is the most conclusive, but the cost of recovery is too high, and plagiarism requires proof, which is even more costly to recover, and at best makes for sympathetic viewers.

When it comes to copywriting, I'm afraid it's even difficult to prove, because the most important part of plagiarism, "form", is gone. The law cannot protect ideas, only forms.

That's why the self-publishing media is the most joyful of all, wash and wash when they want to.

Why is article washing not so rampant in the era of traditional media? Because the publishing platform is narrow, and it is easier and more effective to complain when things go wrong.

This is like people think that there was an academic community in the Republic of China, but why is it gone now? In addition to all the indescribable reasons, the small number of people studying academics in the Republic of China was a very important condition. When a paper came out, there were just a few magazines, just a few hundred people, and anyone could see it.

Now, it's basically just random, I guess. The barriers between disciplines and circles are even bigger than that.

People aren't just shameless; they're shameless because the cost of being shameless is too low and the rewards are too high.

Is scrubbing scripts evil? That's like asking if thievery is evil.

But how many readers are so disgusted with the author and the platform that they vote with their feet because the manuscript was a wash?

If the washout, once detected, is handled as quickly as a traffic accident, say payout, the cost of washout becomes higher.

But technology is one issue; hearts and minds are a bigger issue.

I am pessimistic about this. I can only offer my own condolences and sympathies to the washed up.

As for Zhou Chong, as early as when she called Xiao Hong a "broken shoe", I was her lifelong black.

Whenever someone spins her words in their circle of friends, I comment below telling the TA that this person sucks and that it would be a shame to spin her stuff.

If the person turning ignores me, I block that person. You don't have to coexist with different views.

That's the little I can personally do to accumulate my own blacklist and keep others informed.

It was time consuming and useless. But the motivation is the dignity of the writer in me.

Eight words: treat people with honesty and respect in the prose.

This thing is making a lot of noise, and Flowerdew stepped in with a really big bang, quite the warrior! Strongly support!!!

First, tell us about the first-hand experience of washing and defending the rights of today's headlines.

Just talking about washgate, LIXIL experienced a washgate yesterday.The shuffler's trick is usually to change out your diagrams and remove individual iconic text, paragraph and formatting adjustments.The two screenshots below are my original article and the article that was scrubbed. The person who washed the article actually just changed the picture, then removed the sentence I said, "Sister LIXIL thought about it", and made the bolded font thinner.

Above is my original draft, the difference between it and the following washed out text is the red boxed area

I reported it to the headline immediately after I found out and the headline got back to me and will deal with his violation. The article was removed today when I found out about the scrubber.Really 32 kudos to Headline for dealing with the washout so quickly! It shows that Headline's initial promise to everyone to support originality is true to its word.It is probably the WeChat public number and some other platforms to let the washing of manuscripts, so that Zhou Chong type of people can be unimpeded, if the washing of manuscripts on today's headlines, I guess it is not so easy.

The washout article has been removed!

Second, the washing of manuscripts is the market does not standardize the initial chaos, but out of the mix sooner or later have to return.

Why is that washed-up Zhou Chong so arrogant and reckless?

First, because of the drilling of the market is not standardized at the beginning of the gap, now the content entrepreneurship market has just begun, there are a lot of unsound laws, there are inevitably a lot of people who exploit the loopholes and get rich.And then, on the strength of having money and courage, they can openly trample on moral justice. This is just like in the past, when the reform and opening up of the country had just taken place in the '80s, were there not a lot of people who used all sorts of illegal means to get rich and make money? At that time, weren't all those people so arrogant and wealthy that they walked sideways? Now, looking back, how many of these people had a happy ending?

I just read the news that Hungarian President Schmidt's doctoral thesis was suspected of plagiarism, and that his alma mater has decided to revoke the doctorate he received after publishing the results of its investigation. A week later, the president announced his resignation.As the saying goes, "Good and evil will be rewarded in the end, and the way of heaven is good. If you don't believe it, look up and see who the heavens have spared. We have to believe that, in order not to kill the chicken and take the eggs, and then chaotic market will be standardized sooner or later.

Secondly, Zhou Chong deliberately used robber baron logic to confuse 2 concepts, sharing and plagiarism.If sharing is tantamount to plagiarism, what kind of intellectual property rights are there to speak of in this day and age? To use an analogy, it's like sharing a bicycle for you to use, not letting you take it out and rent it to someone else to earn money, not to mention letting you keep it for yourself.

Thirdly, scriptwashing is the public enemy of all originals, and we should all join forces to resist it.

We all know that bad money expels good money, the end result is that everyone is finished. All the originators of the bullet exhaustion, stay up late, hard work to write out the article, by the washing of manuscripts of people two or three times to take to profiteering, this phenomenon will encourage more speculators, greatly harm the interests of the originators, so that the entire content entrepreneurship market into a vicious cycle of chaos. This is like stealing will not be penalized, then there are countless people to steal, and ultimately this society will be out of order.

For most originals, we have three things to do:

Firstly, we should speak out together to support originality and condemn copywriters to form a common public opinion pressure, so as not to let the copywriters succeed.

Second, to protect their articles, once encountered washing as far as possible to defend their rights, can not be tolerated to put things off, indulge in evil behavior.

Third, we jointly urge the platforms concerned to formulate effective measures to protect originality and increase the penalties for those who launder articles.

When I was a kid, I read a saying: why do good people always fail? Because good people don't know how to join forces. I hope we all work together to maintain a virtuous cycle of content entrepreneurship market, so that the future has hope.

Some of the pictures in this reply are taken from Six God Lei Lei's public number, with thanks.

This question and answer are from the site users, does not represent the position of the site, such as infringement, please contact the administrator to delete.

Related Questions