What is over-testing? Do the patients themselves know? Then don't want a doctor, listen to the doctor when you get to the hospital, I believe most doctors won't mess around, you know, life is important or money is important, if money is important then refuse the so-called excessive examination!

The patient has a natural right to refuse to be examined by a doctor.

There is nothing wrong with going to the hospital when you are unwell and the doctor will conduct various tests according to the patient's condition. However, nowadays, in order to prevent disputes between doctors and patients, doctors will make their patients undergo as many tests as possible so that they will not miss anything.

If the patient has his own experience in this field, refusing some tests of a repetitive nature can save both time and money, provided that you know your own physical condition, better than your doctor.

As the saying goes, if you don't hide your illness from your doctor, you will harm yourself. Most people don't have enough medical knowledge and experience, so it's best to try to follow your doctor's advice when you visit the hospital.

Some time ago, my mother-in-law was unwell, with chest tightness, shortness of breath, dizziness, and occasional palpitations for a short period of time, so she came to us and asked to be led to the hospital for a checkup.

The doctor is my love high school classmate, through the routine examination, very quickly by experience is diabetes complication of coronary artery disease, so, and then opened a further examination, these tests are called CTA, is about the cardiac vascular ultrasound, about more than 1,000 yuan, we refused this test, directly requested to do coronary angiography, the doctor classmates also agree. In the end, the results were not very good, coronary heart disease, diabetes, plus atherosclerosis, requiring elective surgery.

Therefore, a doctor's examination can be refused, provided that one has some medical knowledge, so that at least the treatment of the disease will not be delayed.

Thank you for your invitation! Because it's a matter of life and health, you can't be told a thousand times, simply, whether you have the right to refuse or not. I will answer this question to the best of my knowledge.

1, when you are physically unwell, your first thought is to see a doctor, especially when you have been suffering from illness, you will take the doctor as the only dependence, this time on the doctor should be very trustworthy, especially in the case that you have not been diagnosed with the cause of the disease, you should listen to the doctor to arrange for a variety of tests, after all, the medical sciences are rigorous and complex, professionalism is very strong, each medical practitioners are also hard to read for many years, through the practice before There is a medical qualification, and we do not know anything about the various tests, do not understand excessive not excessive, since the life, body, health unreservedly handed over to the doctor, then you must choose to obey, refused to turn back to their own irresponsible performance;

2, winch two cases, you have been suffering from some kind of disease for many years, thinking that the long illness into a doctor, seems to know more than know more, when going to meet with the doctor, and again asked to check the laboratory tests, that is also the doctor wants to through the image, the data to observe the development of your condition whether there is a change, this is the doctor to the patient's high degree of responsibility, there is no excessive and not excessive problem, there is no need for you to save a couple of money to do smart, when you refuse is not justified. ;

3, winch three cases, that is, within a short period of time, different departments require to do the same kind of examination, such as MRI, there have been patients stormed out of different departments within a week to open nine nuclear magnetic sheet, in fact, the nuclear magnetic each time to check the site is different, there is no excessive, there is no reason to refuse to check;

4, I'll tell you with facts what is over-testing and the patient's right to decisively refuse.

More than ten years ago, my husband was admitted to a famous tertiary hospital in Beijing due to a skin disease, and three days after he was admitted to the hospital, I was urgently called to the hospital by telephone, and the telephone only said that it was about the treatment and asked me to go and sign. I rushed to the hospital in a state of panic, only to be told that they were going to do a coronary angiogram for my husband, and that if a blockage in the blood vessels was detected, direct stenting would be equivalent to killing two birds with one stone, and that if it was not there, it would just be treated as a checkup.

Since this test was all out of pocket at the time, about 5,000 or so, the family was asked to sign off on it. I knew that my husband had never had any heart problems, so why did he have to undergo such a destructive test? I insisted that this was only a way to generate revenue for the hospital and refused. To this day, my husband's heart remains healthy, which, in my opinion, is excessive testing.

In similar situations, we patients have the right to opt out!

It is undeniable that individual unscrupulous doctors are driven by profit, excessive examination, excessive treatment, over-prescription, total disregard for the patient's financial situation, 䝉 suffered losses, but this is an extremely rare phenomenon, encountered only their own long a little more heart, stop in a timely manner, and less waste of money.

Patients have the right to know and choose, and doctors have the duty to inform.

We must say a resounding no to excessive pick-ups. Otherwise it is not only a financial loss, but also affects health, especially for those traumatizing assisted pick-ups.

Easier said than done, it is difficult in practice. The most crucial point is that there is a serious mismatch of medical knowledge and information between doctors and patients.

You can't blame anyone, who made you ignorant? Nor can you blame the patient, everyone can't be a medical expert! There's also the fact that the line between excessive and not-so-excessive for many pickup tests is poorly defined, especially due to the uncertainty of medicine.

What should be done? In the disease pick-up should be based on the principle of choosing the lesser of two evils, on the premise of the doctor's impression of the diagnosis to choose auxiliary pick-up to verify the impression of the diagnosis, rather than pulling a wide net of blind pick-up.

To give full play to health management, we cannot grasp a great deal of medical knowledge and information on our own, so we go and hire a family doctor. It is like hiring a lawyer to protect one's legal rights and interests in a lawsuit.

Finally, we emphasize one issue, patients should tolerate doctors' misdiagnosis, as long as it is not irresponsible, as long as it is not a common sense error, misdiagnosis should be tolerated, medicine is very complex, otherwise doctors can only use irresponsibility to avoid the risk, the victim is still the patient.

Is it necessary to be admitted to the hospital if you are not feeling well? Isn't this a case of a little illness going a long way! First of all, you are condemned for wasting national resources. Our country has been advocating the hierarchical medical system, minor injuries and illnesses community health station completely solve, why still have to go to the third level of medical doctors to do all kinds of tests. Since to the hospital, mostly some difficult diseases to hospital to seek diagnosis and treatment, everything should be said by the doctor. Responsibility is assigned to him to clarify the diagnosis, the reality is that he must have a correct diagnosis. Once there is a misdiagnosis or omission of diagnosis by the medical malpractice to catch the handle will be difficult to blame, they will also be too happy. Therefore, they have to use imaging and laboratory resources to find out the basis of the diagnosis. In theory, this is not wrong, and the purpose of each person to the hospital should also be so. When you pay a large amount of money for this and feel unable to afford it, this kind of temporary problem can not be solved, a brain on the doctors is of course unfair. However, we can't rule out the possibility that some hospitals are encouraging doctors to do unnecessary tests in order to generate revenue, but this phenomenon has been reduced in public hospitals in recent years due to the increased supervision by governments at all levels.

If you find that your doctor has over-examined you in the hospital, you can politely give your reasons to your doctor, who will usually follow your opinion. If the doctor is still adamant about his or her wrongdoings, you can complain to the hospital, and the hospital will usually give you a satisfactory answer. Especially now that hospitals are emphasizing medical ethics, no one wants to get into trouble.

There, fate is in your own hands.

Unless, of course, you're unconscious and let your relatives "sign" it.

Does a patient have the right to refuse the doctor's excessive tests if he or she is admitted to the hospital in ill health? The main hospitalization, you have to listen to the doctor, if you are an outpatient, you can refuse certain tests, you can directly request to take some drugs. But hospitalization is to listen to the doctor, the average patient hospitalized from the blood draw to the various tests next to each other, most of them have to do it again. In the past, hospitals did not have such equipment, of course, there was no need to do excessive tests, the doctor can diagnose the patient's condition based on experience, and carry out certain treatments. But now the hospital has a variety of equipment, into these advanced equipment, of course, is to be used for the patient, can not be put there as a decoration, so as long as the edge of the examination, the doctor will give you to do it again.

Take our child as an example, when he was an intern in the hospital, he saw the head of the department, asked about the general condition of the disease, and then directly prescribed all kinds of tests and CT for the patient. when he saw the old peasant pulling out from his pocket a piece or two a dozen of tattered money to pay the bill, he was very sad, and felt that the patient's condition was so obvious that it could be directly determined to be a certain kind of disease, and that there was no need for the big head of the department to prescribe such an expensive test and let the poor people spend more money on the test. There was no need for a big director to prescribe such expensive tests and make the poor people spend more money on the tests. He accompanied the patient to pay the bill and although he did not say anything, he went home and complained to me. I, however, thought that the Chief Executive was doing all kinds of tests as a precautionary measure and that children should learn from the Chief Executive.

It's like a certain kind of disease, the director, although he says he can tell, this patient's condition, but he can't guarantee that there are no accidents after all. It's as if the patient has this disease, but at the same time there are other diseases, so it is necessary to do the examination. What the director is guarding against, he is guarding against medical malpractice. If anything goes wrong, there will be tug-of-war or medical malpractice, and this will affect the performance of the director or even the loss of his license to practise medicine. Just like what was said on the Internet, there was a very old lady who went to have a stent put in, and the doctor gave her a lot of instructions, telling her that she must take her medication because having a stent put in did not mean that she was cured of her illness, but that she had to take medication all year round to ensure that there was no more blockage of blood vessels in the clogged area. But this surgery was done on the 6th day of the old lady finally died because of heart attack, family members with relatives and full-time medical trouble, in the hospital has been haunted, have been pursuing the doctor's duties, and finally the doctor himself could not think of home to hang himself. Although the doctor was arrested by the police, but also sentenced to imprisonment, but the country more than ten years to train the chief physician so lost, good pity.

I think that at a time when the doctor-patient relationship is becoming increasingly tense and the conflicts between doctors and patients are becoming more and more intensified, it is necessary to over-check before it is too late. Patients are human beings, doctors are also human beings, human beings should stand in their own position to see the problem. When a patient is admitted to the hospital in ill health, and when the patient refuses the doctor's excessive examination, he is also refusing to cooperate with the doctor's treatment. It would be better to check the condition on the Internet, diagnose yourself, treat yourself and take your own medicine.

I once accidentally burned my eyes, black eye burned a small white spot, I went to the hospital, the first item is to spend two dollars to give me a small book about how good this hospital, then register, and then go to the ophthalmology department, the doctor first do not give to see the eyes, one after another are not related to the eyes of the examination, and finally wrote a ticket to let me go to the measurement of the weight of the height, I said: you do not want to see a small disease? I said, "Don't you just want to see a big deal for a small problem?" I just took the money and finished. In the end, I did not go to measure my height and weight, but I paid the money. After paying the money, the doctor looked at it with a mirror and said it was fine, then prescribed a bottle of ciprofloxacin eye drops. I went out to the drugstore and paid three dollars for it and it was fine the next day. In the case you describe, then you have to listen to the doctor, because you don't know what is wrong with your body, then you can't refuse to be examined by the doctor, and you can't be afraid to spend money!

You visit the hospital to choose this hospital, this hospital in your mind credibility is higher, since the admission, and the hospital formed a contractual relationship.

After a patient is hospitalized, there are tests and labs that need to be done in order to diagnose the disease correctly, which is a normal thing and necessary in diagnosing the disease, which you consider to be over-testing.

Cognition, diagnosis and treatment of a disease requires professional knowledge and clinical practice experience, we laymen only know the skin, and professional and technical personnel cognition is far from, do not put our half-knowledge of the disease to criticize the doctor's professional.

Patients generally have to listen to their doctors. If you think that the tests performed by your doctor are unreasonable or excessive, you can make suggestions, and if your doctor adopts your suggestions, you can choose to be discharged and your contractual relationship will end there. You can also refuse to go for these tests, but the disease is in you, and if you can't cure it, the pain and money spent will still be yours, and it will be unfavorable to the subsequent treatment.

Being hospitalized in a hospital and giving their lives to the hospital, patients are the weaker sex. In order to prevent shoplifting, the National Health Commission has made a clear statement of the rights and obligations of patients and required hospitals to post it in a conspicuous place, so that every patient knows his or her rights and obligations.

I. Patients' rights

* The right to equal medical care;

* The right to be respected;

* Right to informed consent;

*Privacy;

* The right to make reasonable recommendations;

II. Patients' obligations

* Obligation to state truthfully information about medical conditions and medical consultations;

* Obligation to cooperate with medical personnel in carrying out examinations and treatment;

* Obligation to pay for medical and other services;

* Obligation to respect medical personnel and other patients;

* Obligation to comply with relevant hospital rules and regulations;

* Patients with infectious diseases and mental illnesses, etc., are obliged to undergo compulsory treatment.

Guru answer, thanks for reading!

As a hospital nowadays, unlike the doctors in the past, they rely on their accumulated skills on the one hand, and on the other hand, they rely on picking up and checking to determine what kind of disease they are suffering from. Nowadays, hospitals basically rely on picking up tests to see the disease. If this one pick up to find the cause of the disease, from another pick up to find, until find the cause of the disease. This is the reason why patients visiting hospitals nowadays will undergo a number of tests for major and minor illnesses, and the reason for the high cost of tests, which has led to a great deal of opinion among patients.

Although it is a number of pick up the patient's opinion, but the diagnosis of disease accuracy is still high, the patient's treatment of disease has the benefit. Hope that the hospital will be the people to see the doctor to pick up the cost of laboratory tests, also included in the scope of reimbursement to the health insurance is good. So as a patient now go to the hospital to see a doctor, or with the doctor to pick up good, do not refuse. As long as the people in the various reimbursement on the strength of a little more, it is good.