Returning to the traditional way of practising Chinese medicine and letting the people choose their doctors, if they feel that it is not secure enough, they can issue licenses for doctors who are officially recognized as such, so as to differentiate them from private doctors. Just like genetically modified food and non-genetically modified food, it is also a matter of writing a few words to make it clear. Is a good doctor is a quack doctor by the people themselves to say, by the people themselves to choose a doctor, laymen do not care too much, control their own not to cheat not to harm people on the line.

Developing Chinese medicine is practically easy, let those doctors who have a better reputation treat the patients, the people recognize them, and quite simply let the people themselves choose their own doctors. As in choosing a representative of the size of the people, rather than letting the figures above come and choose the doctors, because people from far away do not know the local doctors.

That's a good question. A so-called quack is a two hundred and fifty percent herbalist, right? That's how I understand it anyway. You say that this quack does not know Chinese medicine, right? He knows a little bit. You say he knows Chinese medicine, right? He does not have any great effect in treating patients. Anyway, he makes money first. Quackery is to make some money but can not destroy Chinese medicine. Because the people finally look at the efficacy of treatment. A real Chinese medicine practitioner does not aim at making money. I've seen great Chinese medicine, see the doctor does not mention money. Look at the good you look at your own to give. Another quack doctor to patients are prescribed more than a dozen Chinese medicine. The cost of medication goes up. I personally encountered such an old Chinese doctor in Beijing, but also very famous bullish very. After one time I never look for him to see a doctor again. The real Chinese medicine are three or five payments of Chinese medicine, up to seven payments of Chinese medicine, and then let you follow-up, and then give the patient pulse, and then prescribe drugs. Slowly regulate the patient's illness. So Chinese medicine is not as lucrative as Western medicine. Chinese medicine does not contain hormones and has few side effects. So Chinese medicine is not something that quacks6 can destroy. Just a matter of time. Over time, you see those real Chinese medicine everyone, famous, see the patient more people, good medical ethics, efficacy and good. Medical ethics is not good, you can rest assured that his efficacy is not good. Time will tell. But patients can not wait. Only the doctor himself slowly prove themselves. So do not want to get rich doing Chinese medicine this line. You see the old Chinese medicine are old, good medical ethics, he is with a lifetime of time to prove themselves, accumulate experience. Quacks with bad medical ethics rely on cheating. As a result, quacks have no good results. This is Chinese culture (cause and effect). Real Chinese medicine doctors know this truth.

Chinese medicine theory of yin and yang and five elements (used in life and health research) determines that Chinese medicine is inevitably quackery, and the more pure Chinese medicine is the more quackery. The reason is very simple, life science is a natural science, can only use the theory of (natural) science to guide the practice is the only correct path, yin and yang five elements theory and natural science theories are incompatible with the opposite way.

Why doesn't anyone mention the sea of drug-selling doctors of Western medicine? It is never the quacks who destroy Chinese medicine, only the western medical groups who malign and destroy their competitors for profit.

Want to develop Chinese medicine, to ask the big old western doctors, want to develop Chinese medicine, to ask the authority, want to develop Chinese medicine, to ask the group interests, folk Chinese medicine, to ask the supervision of the number of sores built, folk Chinese medicine, to ask how many years of death, folk Chinese medicine, generations are extinct.

Chinese medicine is high-dimensional thinking, celestial beings and celestial beings are united, the Way is simple, virtue and goodness, and the development of Chinese medicine depends on the correct leadership of the Party, on the cultivation of Chinese medicine talents, and on building a pyramid of Chinese medicine talents, and its foundation is the literacy of all Chinese medicine practitioners, and the unraveling of folk Chinese medicine, and only by doing so can Chinese medicine become vibrant, and anything else is just nonsense.

Chinese medicine is not standardized and cannot be quantified. What criteria should be used to measure whether one is a quack or not? Take a simple example, if a Chinese medicine master says you have kidney deficiency and a Chinese medicine master says you have kidney loss as a reason for taking leave, can the factory manager approve it? How to prove the so-called deficiency? How can it be quantified and by what standard? The law is also unable to make a judgment. Therefore, our law does not recognize the use of Chinese medicine in many important occasions, for example, it does not recognize the medical examination of Chinese medicine practitioners, the issuance of medical certificates by Chinese medicine practitioners, the use of Chinese medicine practitioners in customs, and the issuance of evidence by Chinese medicine practitioners in the court. ......... The so-called good doctors and quacks, Chinese medicine people you play by yourself.

Who is a good doctor and who is a quack? Who is the judge? What are the fair criteria? Since ancient times, folk Chinese medicine practitioners have been divided into different sects to step on each other and pinch each other, and they all think that theirs is the authentic school, and it is almost difficult to have academic consistency and standards. Besides, each Chinese medicine practitioner is not good at all diseases can be cured, you did not cure maybe he cured, he did not cure maybe you cured, in this case you can easily distinguish who is a good doctor and who is a quack? You let the patients to judge, the good doctor will say he is a good doctor, did not give the good one will say he is a quack. In short, in the absence of a modern scientific standard and method of efficacy statistics, it is impossible to fairly judge the good doctors and quacks, and there are limitations in relying only on the limited so-called word of mouth.

The competition must have mutually recognized judging criteria and recognized referees, and must follow the recognized rules of the game, which cannot be filled by their respective friends, relatives and fans in order to be unfair. There must also be a scientific standard and method for determining good doctors and quacks.

Firstly to separate the westernized combination of Chinese and Western medicine ...... Secondly to exorcise the jianghu suishi from the medical old man ......

The process of using Chinese medicine prohibits the use of Western diagnosis and diagnostic data, which is favorable to the development of Chinese medicine. It is also good for the patients to reduce a lot of unnecessary costs.