Through this epidemic can be seen, with the development and construction of China's cities, the rapid expansion of residential neighborhoods, some neighborhoods in addition to the property and then no other, resulting in the grass-roots management of the city has a lot of blank lots. Wuhan this national anti-epidemic, it is exposed only by the power of the street office can not be fully extended along to the residents. To reverse the status quo of weak urban grass-roots management, we must change the current mode of community property management, direct management by the street office, :|: so that both reduce the residents' property costs, but also to strengthen urban grass-roots management!

After the abolition of the property by the community involved in the owners of self-government, it is very simple, the owners' committee of three to five people can be, in addition to a driver and liaison officer is full-time, other people are uniformly retired people in the community, part-time paid work, all the community property uniform temporary Gu with the social domestic help or full-time casual labor to do, and these full-time service personnel to establish Gu with the benefit of credit, the quality of the benefit of the owners' committee and all the owners to assess the quality of service fees collection and expenditure by the community to manage the WeChat group to keep informed about the community, and through WeChat regularly assess the performance of the owners, and election and other matters. The collection and expenditure of service fees by the community involved in the management, the establishment of community owners WeChat group, timely notification of the relevant situation in the community, and through WeChat regularly assess the performance of owners' committee members, and elections and other matters.

After the abolition of the property, in the community in the form of village autonomy to set up, the community as the leader of the owners of the self-governing committee, the community administration and community utilities (such as, security, cleaning, maintenance of equipment and facilities, etc.) paid services separately, to the community of the administrative power in the grass-roots level of the party organization, but also the autonomy of the right to supervise the guardian owners and the villagers of the form of organizations set up in the form of residents of the building owners' group, to guide the owners of the community to play a The role of the master, as for paid services, can be open bidding recruitment of third-party professional services companies (such as security companies, cleaning companies, or professional mechanical and electrical services companies, etc.) to participate in the construction of the community, but also set up their own professional services team is responsible for, it must be done 么开民主, must be accepted by the industry effectively supervise the direct leadership of the community, especially the financial must be open and transparent, so that everything runs under the sun, for the service fee rates Must be widely discussed by the owners and then determine the service fee charged to build a special account management, name details to the household, the allocation of the service fee, color take the form of scoring each service project led by the community community by the owners or owners' representatives acceptance of the evaluation, so that the people as much as possible, make the best use of the material, the financial does not fall through, so that the community management out of a no property, will be better road!

Didn't the city run well when there was no property? Now the neighborhood family councils still exist, as does the police station. There are sanitation bureaus under the street offices. These have certain functions. They are not required to clean up, take out the garbage, or be security guards. They just have to do their job. In the neighborhood, these specific jobs can be recruited Dan's housekeeping division hourly workers. The same can solve the social employment problem. The neighborhood doorman is actually the communication room of the past, the original is the unit of money, into the owners of the money is. Property companies can exist. Which neighborhoods want to hire, hire is it. The Property Management Ordinance does not stipulate that the property must be hired. Our neighborhood, the owners' committee hired after the property, do not care about anything, the owners reflect the problem of ignoring the pick, 4 years do not open the owners' meeting. The Property Management Ordinance has not been implemented. Is it necessary for such a committee and property to exist?

Property is a freak species. If the developer manages it himself, it is still justifiable. The property divisions set up in the community are all private enterprises, which earn money for the sake of earning money. Can you imagine that it can manage well? Recruit some of the old, sick and disabled, give some wages can eat, so what can some people do? There are not many will work, originally need ten people it recruit five can imagine how much work can save how much money, property companies have too many disadvantages. The people's property fees. All into the hands of a certain person. So the property and the owners are in conflict. So the property company must be removed. Property fees should be fair and reasonable.

Property should be replaced by streets. The property fees collected should be managed by the state. A professional maintenance company should be set up by the street, and the street should recruit maintenance professionals (paying five insurance and one gold), including security guards (a small number of retirees can be used). Cleaning staff can also use healthy retirees. By the street to send national cadres to manage, whether it is maintenance, health, security for the people have the benefit of social security more favorable. To the owners of the maintenance can not charge, only to take the material costs (can also be purchased by the maintenance workers installed,) the state unified management, one-stop service. The people are assured that the happiness of the people, remove the ground, the people have no resentment. This account is very clear. The people out of property costs. The state gives management. The remaining funds can also be used for the people. Why not be happy?

Property management and owners of today's relationship, no less than the landlords and farmers before the land reform concern, touching people's hearts. I personally believe that the street, the neighborhood committee to manage the way, let the neighborhood committee to take the lead, the owners of self-government, the street party branch supervision.

What a lot of people propose to go for property abatement? It's only a small percentage of people who make a fuss online, not many people are going to get rid of their properties in life.

At least no one in our surrounding neighborhoods wants to cancel, and most people are still happy. Those neighborhoods that made trouble turned out to be no better, forcing out the properties, only to end up with elevators out of service, garbage all over the place, and residents complaining.

What the hell kind of trick is it that none of those people who are making noise every day about eliminating property have stepped up to the plate as council members? It's hard to do anything other than not pay your property taxes.

Resident self-governance can only be a small district, there are a few colorful quality of people preside over can be resolved, the size of the district absolutely can not work, no one has so much energy and professionalism, will only make the community beach lax, can not function, absolutely do not support the community unmanaged state.

As long as the property is under the leadership of the higher authorities, formal, professional operation is satisfactory, of course, pay the property fee to the corresponding level of service.

During the epidemic, the community property plays an irreplaceable role, property staff day and night vigilance, tireless, from beginning to end, is really admirable from the heart. For the owners of the district, the daily affairs of many things is really less property help. Cancel the property I am 10,000 against, and those who readily proposed the abolition of the property, I do not think its character!

It seems that you are young, before the reform and opening up there is no property company, then how to manage you ask on the line, at that time, the residents and the government's contact is very close, the neighborhood committee is familiar with the situation of each family in the entire community, the neighborhood committee to organize the activities of the community to achieve a detailed management of the entire community.

To be honest, a lot of property has a dark background, poor service, high fees, robbery, oppression of owners should have been banned. After the outlawing of the property, it would be better to have a street office to manage the property instead.