Zhu Yuanzhang asked the teacher to teach the Prince to read, the teacher asked offhandedly: disobedience can be beaten? Zhu Yuanzhang categorical answer: not dead can! So, the teacher agreed without hesitation, without half excuses.

This teacher is Song Lian, a great scholar at the end of the Yuan and the beginning of the Ming Dynasty, who is especially good at the Four Books and Five Classics, and even Liu Bowen is ashamed to be inferior to him. When Li Shanchang, the prime minister of the Ming Dynasty, heard that Zhu Yuanzhang, the first emperor of Ming Dynasty, was choosing a teacher for his crown prince Zhu Biao, he recommended Song Lian.

Song Lian came to see Zhu Yuanzhang accompanied by Li Shanchang and Liu Bowen, and opened his mouth to ask the previous question directly. Zhu Yuanzhang's attitude and answer made Song Lian feel from the bottom of his heart that the founding emperor was genuinely interested in teaching the crown prince.

It has been a consensus throughout history that strict teachers produce good students. "Whether it is strict or not, or whether it is really strict or not, is a matter of attitude and determination. Zhu Yuanzhang's yardstick is "just don't die!". . Visible this beggar emperor's sincerity.

Nowadays, there is no room for a ruler in education in terms of the "degree of strictness". The "Western school thieves" even advocate the so-called "happy learning". I am not an educator myself, but I believe in the role of "a ruler at home".

Therefore, I have two "ruler" in my house. One hangs in the study, where my son does his homework; the other is in my bedroom, where I can see it at all times - as the saying goes, a father's faults are not taught, and I want it to wake me up at all times.

I agree with the saying that "strict teachers produce good students", but on the question of "whether a teacher should hit a child or not", I would first like to express my own opinion that it is extremely wrong and even illegal for a teacher to hit his or her own students for the following reasons:

1, the teacher beat the student, this is involved in the "teacher moral" big problem, the child's parents send him (her) to school is to learn cultural knowledge, not let the teacher beat, beat the child's right is his parents. If the student's parents to bring a group of people to the school to make trouble, dry scratching disrupt the normal order of teaching and learning in the school, in addition to requiring the school to taste the damages caused by the beating of the child. If the matter is serious, then the principal can be approved by the Board of Education, dismissed the teacher who beat the public office.

2, the teacher abuses the students' right to discipline, and the right to discipline should be punished by standing, or copying homework, etc., rather than beating their own students. Even if a student makes a mistake, he can only criticize and educate, while the teacher beats the student, which is the teacher's "incompetence" performance, with simple and rough methods instead of "silent" strict teacher's practice.

3, teachers beat their own students, which is against the law, because both the Law on the Protection of Minors and the Teachers' Law enacted by the State explicitly stipulate that any child enjoys the right to education, of which article 15 of the Law on the Protection of Minors stipulates that "the teaching staff of schools and kindergartens shall respect the human dignity of minors, and shall not inflict on underage pupils and children No minor pupil or child shall be subjected to corporal punishment, disguised corporal punishment or any other act that insults human dignity".

Many people know that it does not mean "strict", so I will not say more. In addition, many people think that it means "strict requirements", which is a more reasonable and superficial understanding, not wrong, but I think it is not quite accurate!

The ancients called their fathers "Jia Yan", "strict father, kind mother" is a common phenomenon in all traditional Chinese families, so "Yan Shi" should be the same as the father's teacher! The two characters "Yan" have similar connotations.

First, a dignified attitude. New Year's time many people will be posted at home, "respect the word paper" small banners, that is the respect for knowledge, and the teacher as the embodiment of knowledge, naturally, to have a solemn, dignified attitude!

Second, knowledge. Teachers are knowledgeable and can teach, teach, and explain in order to make students' knowledge systematic and rigorous!

The above two points, the former is the form, the latter is the content, complementary, indispensable, which is the true meaning of "strict teacher"! As for whether or not you can fight, depending on their own understanding!

Hello. - Hi! I've come to talk about myself!

I would not and do not approve of a teacher hitting a child !

But every good teacher should be a strict teacher. Strict teacher out of high students, strict teacher rely on their own profound knowledge, noble personality, superior teaching skills and meticulous work attitude. Meticulousness better describes the word strict. It is not that strictness is associated with beating! A truly strict teacher does not beat children but loves them and does not treat them in a simple and rough way! Of course, parents teach their children to hit or not to hit, that is the matter of the child's parents! A teacher should never hit a child!

Teachers hit kids and there are serious consequences!

1. A child holds a grudge! Hurting a child's young mind may be remembered for the rest of their life! Doesn't it also come out frequently on the internet that years later there are still those who seek to settle scores with their teachers?
2. Teacher morality is not sufficient to allow. Teachers beat children, contrary to the teacher's morality, is a behavior that can be on the line, teachers should also know how to protect themselves from touching the red line!
3. It is illegal for a teacher to hit a child! If the beating is serious, it is a crime! If it's not serious, you'll lose your job, and if it's serious, you'll go to jail.

Students can not hit, can not be scolded, in the face of those who are stubborn, repeated offending, the most detestable is the classroom also disrupt classroom discipline affecting the teacher and classmates in the classroom how to do?

Here's what I did:

1. Remind and sternly stop in class. Generally this time Hou students will be convergent. But there will be students in your stop when the public backlash, this time is the test of your time, it is estimated that a lot of students hit the situation occurs at this moment, a moment of impulse regret! Teachers, don't be impulsive, this time my approach is to deal with cold, tell other students not to be affected, let's continue the lesson. x students you also first calm down!

2. Take the initiative to communicate with students after class and talk to them as friends! This treatment is still useful for some students. 3. 3, their own strength can not be solved, but also can be combined with the class refresher, parents to pressure students, do the work.

4, really can not, the problem will be reflected to the school! The school, parents, teachers, and the students themselves communicate together to solve the problem!

Conclusion: be a strict teacher, but never hit a child! Peers, do you go ahead and hit your students? Feel free to leave me a message and share together! I'm @XuXuEducation, a first-line math senior teacher, follow me, and share with you a little bit of education life!

Singing in the clouds to talk about the views: in today's legal system in the context of society, if individual teachers are still playing "strict" and "love" under the guise of hands to beat students, but also called "strict teacher out of the high students! ", seemingly 'reasonable' in fact not 'reasonable', but also not "legal"!

Let's look at two cases first:

Recently, a senior teacher in Jiangsu slapped a student broke the phone was suspended at the end of the matter triggered a hot debate across the network, I give "teaching according to the law is not over the rules, enhance the teacher's morality is not rushed, a different perspective to solve the conflict," the view, reminding all the teachers, no matter what you are for what kind of original intention and motivation, don't do is the bottom line, gambling on the professional future is really not worth it! Of course, it is not to say that regardless of disciplinary violations of the students, but rather, to pay attention to the proportion, with the right method, to restrain the impulse.

A few days ago, a parent disliked a teacher as "unworthy of being a teacher" because "the teacher made a video of his student sleeping in class and posted it to the class parents' group, which triggered a public outcry.

Case provoked thinking:

Personally, I feel that the teachers in the above two cases are definitely responsible and strict teachers or even famous teachers, and their starting point must be "for the sake of the children's well-being, hoping to rely on harsh or even extraordinary means to discipline (no, it should be a lesson to manage) the students, and maybe in the future the children can become "high students", and maybe the parents will even thank me for my "strictness". Maybe the parents will even thank me for my "strictness". However, I would like to ask, "Your thoughts and motives are good and beautiful, but who knows? Who will recognize it? And once you have to beat people smashed cell phone shooting video sent group behavior, the child quit, parents quit, the competent part of the quit, public opinion quit, because you lose in the 'reason' and 'law'! Since unreasonable and illegal, then all the consequences you do not bear who bear, and there may be people because of your illegal behavior is accountable to be disciplined."

Back to the subject.：

The subject of the question has "said" two words, to clarify is "said" in fact "who did not say", the old ancestors said put today is not appropriate; 'strict teacher' of "strict" should be 'strict, rigorous, serious' meaning; The "high disciple" of "high" is the quality of noble and high talent, right? Strict teacher out of the high disciples' probability, "Confucius three thousand disciples, the sage is only seventy-two people', as far as I know, Confucius is a great Confucian saint, and does not rely on simple and brutal strict training out of the high disciples of it, his old man advocated that "according to the material to teach, do not angry not start"! We do teachers, the face of students in all shapes and sizes, students standing behind the parents in all shapes and sizes, in the face of "problem students", don't be impatient, use your brain to find a way to manage to be reasonable, punishments to be legal!

Putting songs in the clouds to persuade again:

When the strict teacher and high students meet, relying on the timing of education by chance, that is, Bo Ya and Ziqi common interpretation of the high mountains and flowing water, I'm lucky to get it, not my life! Do not in the name of strict and love, hard to spell out the "high disciples' false image, the teacher really should not hit the students, please think deeply!

I'm Song of the Clouds, concerned about the education of the big and small things, willing to grow with the children! I would like to discuss with you about your child's education! I'd like to make friends with you!

Strict teacher, first of all, is a teacher of strict self-discipline, as the saying goes, its body is not ordered to do, although its body is not ordered not to do. In front of the students to have a certain artistry, grace and authority, so that students can not catch your management limits.

Education law clearly stipulates; prohibit corporal punishment and disguised corporal punishment of students, so you can not hit the children strict teacher is able to control the students of teachers. I have a student, just started classes, especially naughty, and even often violate the classroom discipline, in the conditions of my grace and mercy, and constantly change themselves. When he returned to his alma mater during his college vacation, he said to me, "Teacher, I want to come to see you, but I'm always afraid to see you." This may be the result of my being a strict teacher.

In fact, there are times when students are really disobedient and even violate discipline. As teachers, we may have been torn between hitting and not hitting. In today's education, praise and encouragement is the teacher's greatest weapon, to capture the hearts of students, so that students around you, around you to learn is the greatest success!

It has been said since ancient times that strict teachers produce high quality students. Teachers hit children with their hands I think it is not right. Moderate corporal punishment can be dealt with. Such as punishment to run the playground, push-ups, practicing handwriting and beat the board are desirable. The author believes:

First of all: strictness should be reflected in the attitude. Teaching and educating people, the first thing to be strict in the students' attitude towards learning. Only with the right attitude, learning will be conscious and diligent. Because scholars know why they want to learn.

Second: Strictness should be reflected in teaching by example. Teachers teach by example, with action as an example is the silent language, which is recognized as one of the good methods of teaching by example.

Once again: If a teacher hits someone, it will not only affect the teacher's reputation, but also damage the image of the teacher's loving heart, the gardener's diligence, and the god of the candle. More will let the students young heart printed on the shadow. Thus, the teachers in people's hearts and minds of the noble image greatly reduced.

Theoretically, teachers should not hit their students. In a society governed by the rule of law and where human rights are paramount, parents should not beat their children, let alone teachers.

However, the traditional culture of "filial sons under the stick" does not seem to be a fallacy.

Also, in the world of adults, the rule of law is needed to regulate the behavior of people, for the ability to distinguish, self-control are not strong underage students, especially the bear children, just by the bitter persuasion of education, do you think the effect?

Again, to put a finer point on it: normal human thinking in general: what kind of student gets hit by a teacher? The ones who follow school discipline?

What kind of teacher hits a student? A Buddhist teacher? A teacher who does more than he or she wants to do? A teacher who says, "It's not your child, why bother?"

What was the reason for the teacher hitting the student? What was the purpose? For personal revenge? For the pleasure of hitting? Or is it to stop and correct a student's behavior so that it does not spread through the class and affect other students.

Without further ado, the picture.

This is yesterday's incident, about the "teacher hit students", see the crowd's opinion, see the wisdom of it.

There is also this insight.

And then there are the people who prove to me personally that "there are hundreds of people in all shapes and sizes".

Also, with such an idealized demand of the teacher that the students are not compliant, in that the teacher is not credible or charismatic, what is happening to the rest of the class that is compliant?

and teachers struggle to educate and manage students.

It is a question of whether the teacher manages the students, strict or not, hit or not.

In fact, in my more than 20 years of teaching career, I have really seen an "inhuman" counterparts, is the classroom teacher. It is really inexplicable that the students are scolded, sometimes even our teachers can not see past, what is the result? Parents are really afraid of the evil, for fear that their children are subject to retaliation, is to bear to endure, not only do not dare to report, but instead of competing to the class teacher, flattering, flattering, class teacher's desk, parents sent flowers and fruit chocolate did not break the flow of time.

But, to be honest, the homeroom teacher was also a great leader. He specialized in taking over the class, and he was a great help to the school.

Back on topic, should a teacher hit a student?

Why fight? Why do you beat them? What kind of student gets hit by a teacher? What kind of teachers beat their students? Who benefits from beating students? Who gets in trouble?

There's no answer to that question, it's all reflection.

I agree with the premise that a strict teacher makes a good student, whether or not you should hit your child is another matter.

I remember when I was in elementary school, almost all teachers hit students, often the more powerful teachers, the more out of the results, the impression at that time is that the teacher hit the students is natural, with the development of the times, the teacher is not allowed to corporal punishment of students, which is expressly prohibited, now almost no teacher to hit the students, but does not exclude a few teachers, and now a lot of teachers because of hitting the students to board the "headlines", so now even if the students do not study will not hit the students, some teachers even give up some of the backward students.

I don't think a strict teacher has to beat, appropriate corporal punishment can be used and is effective, for example, punitive standing. However, I personally still do not agree with hitting students, because hitting students is not convenient to limit, with what to hit, how to hit, how to hit the degree of how to ask, if allowed to hit students, many teachers will be indiscriminate use of their rights, some teachers will vent their personal anger on students, it will be very easy to appear to hit and hurt students, the biggest is still the negative impact on the student's psychology.

Therefore, teachers should think about how to improve their own charisma and teaching methods, rather than thinking of "beating" to make students fear you and learn.

Hello. - Hi! Thanks for the invitation.

There is nothing wrong with the saying that a strict teacher makes a good student. But being strict doesn't necessarily mean you have to hit your kids.

There are many ways and means to be strict, for example:

1. When your child first starts practicing reading and writing Chinese characters, and reading and writing English letters, you can ask him/her to read and write according to the spelling rules and writing rules, once not twice, twice not three times, and practice over and over again until you can read and write.

2. When a child can't memorize, he/she can be allowed to spend more time. Teachers and parents should also give necessary guidance and cooperation.

3. Write math math problems step by step to get a name is to try to write step by step clearly, numbers written standardized.

Just wait.

According to my actual observation of teaching, most children are still obedient, basically able to follow the teacher's requirements to complete. But there are also disobedient children, mainly some boys, these children do not follow the rules of learning, you can first communicate with parents, communication, with the cooperation of parents, to correct the child's poor learning behavior. If the good said stay said, can not work, as a teacher can give the necessary discipline. This also has to pay attention to ways and means, specific problems specific treatment.

In short, the goal is to turn the child around, and the necessary discipline is a means to an end, not an end in itself.

In 2019, the Ministry of Education launched the Rules for Primary and Secondary School Teachers to Implement Educational Discipline, which may now be in the consultation stage, and if it can be implemented, teachers will have a legal basis for discipline, and disobedient students may be better managed.

I don't know if the above answer will help you and everyone else? Thanks for reading!

(Note: Pictures from the Internet, such as infringement deleted)