What do you think about the public opinion that says: low quality marriage is better than high quality solitude, but senior singles will slowly become a social problem?
What do you think about the public opinion that says: low quality marriage is better than high quality solitude, but senior singles will slowly become a social problem?
Thanks for the invite.
Even so, I'm in favor of quality celibacy over low quality marriage.
After all, it is no longer the case that there exists any quality in the presence of those marriages that damage lives, and the low quality is really visible.
And as far as retirement goes, I don't think that's ever been an issue.
If a person is old and needs to be taken care of, they can set up some 'old people's homes' with their close friends and girlfriends, or even with their relatives and sisters or something like that.
We all learn, sing, dance and work out together every day to improve the quality of our lives.
Indeed when you get old, you can come together and take care of each other, because the dependence on each other makes you close to each other.
No love, but trust in each other.
Is this any worse than those widowed marriages?
Is a cheating marriage any worse than those whose partners cheat?
Is being single really that bad compared to those who have devoted their lives to their families and children, only to be disliked by their partners when they get old, saying, 'The face is too ugly, it's terrible to look at' and all these very bad things?
At least I don't dislike myself like that. I feel that even if I grow old someday, I will definitely be a beautiful old lady, even if I am full of wrinkles, so what?
Some men, not knowing what superiority complex exists, are a mess themselves and have to resent the women around them in every way.
And there are some women, no matter what, who are beyond his reach forever.
Some women are the same, obviously around the man is very good, or do not know good, what Ma Rong, Zhai Xinxin stream is not a few.
Please those women let go of those good men, there are actually a lot of good women in the neighborhood who are single 😏.
So, overall, in my opinion, it's better to be quality and single than to endure a life of humiliation and misery.
But we don't want to be single just to gamble with the world, still:
"It's great not to be married, and congratulations on having a lot of freedom;
It's great to be married too, and congrats on the extra company;
It's great to have a baby. You have a continuation of your life;
Dink is fine, you live for yourself;
Divorce is great, you're brave enough to say no to mistakes;
It's nice to grow old together. You know how to be understanding and tolerant.
There's nothing superior about being single, and nothing to brag about when you're married.
Marrying yourself off is nothing, living beautifully is the real deal."
I'm Joyful as Haru 520, welcome [follow] my headline, which is a daily reminder to remember yourself, see yourself as well as love yourself in the present moment.
Specializing in self-improvement, self-recovery, emotional development, gender relations, marriage and family many issues.
We also hope that you can leave your views in the comments section so that we can discuss and learn from each other.

I'm still more in favor of quality alone time. The kind of sleeping together and quarrelling all day long, how much trauma it brings to each other's spirit, and how the torture of the mind loses one's will more than that of the body, and how it affects one's work and future greatly. What is the use of such a marriage? It is better to live a life in style. When it is time to work, work seriously, when it is time to rest, one person to eat the whole family is not hungry. I have been divorced for eighteen years. Until now, I am still single, and the people who used to know me are still younger and more energetic than I was eighteen years ago. I don't have a man than have a man also dashing some. Often also a person traveling around. Financially, I am many times better than before, mainly because I am mentally happy.
"Low-quality marriage is better than high-quality solitude, but senior singles will slowly become a social problem"
This is classic karma. A lifetime of not marrying or having children can be characterized as quality solitude. Because, it is indeed very pleasant to consume all the short decades of life on your own.
Not laboring over family conflicts or worrying about raising children.
However, one cannot be young forever. What should be done in old age, especially when one is slowly becoming overwhelmed with life and gradually unable to take care of oneself?
This cannot be dismissed as a potential social problem. This situation also existed in the past, but the number was small. In the countryside, they are called five-guarantee households, and in the cities, they are called widows and widowers.
However, as more and more people are single and living alone nowadays, what will happen to the large number of elderly people who are single and living alone in a few years' time?
In fact, it is very simple, that is, to go with the flow. Because, with the continuous development of society, the sunrise industry will sooner or later form a scale. Because, the market demand is business opportunities. Therefore, there is no need to worry about the sky, the car to the mountain.
It's better to live the moment carefully first!

Marriages without quality are certainly less comfortable than celibacy, and marriages without an economic foundation are not destined to be happy. The rising divorce rate in the country is proof enough. As to whether celibacy becomes a social problem in old age, there is no need to worry. There is no need to worry about it. In the future, there will be a diversified development of old age, and different groups of people will choose different ways to live in their old age. The happiest thing is to be healthy and happy in the present.
The argument that a low-quality marriage is better than high-quality solitude has been very prevalent in recent years.
New terms such as postpartum depression, widowed parenting, and cloud spouses arise frequently, like a sharp blade that cuts through the layers of a marriage's veneer to reveal the not-so-glamorous core within.
People who are already hovering outside the walled city become timid, so "a low-quality marriage is better than high-quality solitude" becomes an excuse for people to refuse to be hurt and to reject marriage.
However, it's easy to know and hard to do, and quality alone time is not for everyone.
First of all, you need a strong heart to face the outside world questioning
The social pattern of China for thousands of years is to emphasize the succession of generations and the continuation of incense.
By choosing to be single, you are to a certain extent standing against the traditional concepts, and the pressure you are subjected to is by no means trivial.
If you want to remain a quality single, you need to be super resilient to stress in the first place.
There was a news story the other day where an older single girl was gossiped about by her colleagues in her father's unit...is it a shame that she's still not married at 30?
The girl heard very angry, ran to the theory and others, in the process of arguing, too excited anger actually fainted.
Obviously, glassy-eyed and soft-eared, such mental qualities can never support outside finger-pointing.
When you are on the road to singleness, when you are questioned by friends and family to the point of skepticism, it is likely that halfway through the journey, you will rush into a low-quality marriage that is quite unworthy.
Second, the economic foundation must be strong
Recent big data show that China's marriage rate hit a 10-year low, while the divorce rate has gone all the way up, with more than half of them initiated by women.
This shows that more and more women are straightening their backs and have the courage to say no to a less-than-ideal marriage.
And the bottom line is that it comes from a strong economy.
When a woman can afford to buy a bag, travel, support herself, and live a nourishing and prosperous life, she will be more flexible in her attitude towards marriage or singleness.
For example, Xu Qing, Yu Feihong, a top time beauty, they can live in the middle age more and more free and transparent, and they are strong enough to economic ability is not related.
Finally, the spiritual world is rich enough
A life lived only once is not about simply surviving, but about passionately perceiving the world and living a full and beautiful life.
Only if the spiritual world is rich enough and dare to face loneliness and isolation, single women can reap the benefits of a quality life.
Joan Chen is one actress who has done a particularly good job.
She can stay at home and tease the pets as a housewife, or go into a variety show to show a thousand faces of life; she can relax and go to Melbourne to feel the autumn, or hold a book to read poetry for everyone.
She has the courage to love and to be alone.
So, for good women, being single or married is never a matter of choice.
Welcome to follow @SouthwindSpeak I'll speak softly, you listen carefully.
Whether you choose to be married or single, no one can arbitrarily say that your singleness is "high quality" and someone else's marriage is "low quality"!
For, according to the principle that existence is rational, marriage is rational and so is singleness, but there is absolutely no distinction between high and low.
Marriage is a great proposition, and since the beginning of mankind, human marriage, no matter what you say about it, has been instrumental in the social process of mankind. You can neither glorify it nor deny it all, it will always be there. Regardless of legal and de facto marriages, marriage is the lifeblood of human existence. Although marriage has been criticized and blamed for thousands of years, its social value is undeniable.
From the height of human and national development.
If everyone was single, the human race would die out forever.
Do not say that there are many singles in Europe and the United States, and do not say that there are tons of singles in Japan. These countries respect people's freedom, but this social phenomenon is regarded as a social problem, and the government and all parties in the society are trying to solve it positively.
As we all know, the United States is the first immigrant country, he is very chicken thief! All kinds of immigrants to enrich the population, and many immigrants are highly educated elite, the United States economic development has an immeasurable huge contribution.
Germany accepted a large number of refugees, in addition to the humanitarian spirit, but more importantly, can obtain a large number of labor force, although the quality of the refugees is uneven, but for the dwindling population of Germany, it is a large number of enrichment.
Refugees are a big problem and are solved by slow naturalization, which is a small matter compared to the danger of the possible demise of the country if the population decreases.
From the above, it is clear that population is important and marriage is important, and it also shows that too many singles can be disastrous for the nation and the country.
The result of a family that is not a family is a country that is not a country; if the skin does not exist, will the hair be attached to it?
Nowadays, some people advocate that they would rather have "high-quality singles" than "low-quality marriages", which is self-righteous and irresponsible.
The so-called "high-quality singles", just by their own excellent economic conditions, have culture, young and color, can be leisurely can be arbitrary, this is far from high-quality.
Without the dynamics of family life of husband and wife and children, without the noisy friction of marriage pots and pans, without the true experience of sex and love, limited to material and pleasure, this spiritual life is imperfect, not to mention the so-called "high-quality", but only self-appreciation, a fool's dream!
Especially if you put yourself on the high ground of "high quality singles" and cynically criticize the "low quality" of most marriages, this kind of speech is not "high quality" but rather This kind of speech itself is not "high-quality", but "low-quality" empty cry.
Unbeknownst to you, your "high quality" needs to be supported by your labor and the labor of many others. A single person cannot be "high quality" without the support of family and society. When you are single and old, you have to rely on the children raised by the marriage of the majority of people to hold up the sky above you!
It's your choice if you want to be "quality single", but you don't have the right to label others as "low quality". Honestly, you don't even have the guts to enter into a marriage, so how can you dictate and judge other people's marriages?
Moreover, being single will also lead to old age, and if everyone is single, it will lead to the decline of the river and the endangerment of people's lives. How can there be "quality" in a single person's society?
Compared with society, the individual is small. To use the unsatisfactory marriages of some people to negate the positive significance of marriage to society in one's personal opinion is to see only the trees but not the forest; to be blinded by one leaf but not Mt. Tai!



1 Being alone doesn't mean you don't have a lover 2 Being married doesn't mean you're happy 3 Being single doesn't mean you're lonely 4 Being married is not a mandatory option in life 5 Honor your parents, you don't need anyone else to approve of your life!
Like to grow old alone is right, do not like to grow old alone or to have a marriage, to marriage and do not want a low-quality marriage have to both sides, especially your own to operate, a good marriage is to operate out of the world where there is a match made in heaven unparalleled marriage? After all, everyone's growth environment is not the same, everyone has their own unique character temperament, habits, interests and hobbies ...... their own teeth and bite their lips, not to mention the growth of different environments of the two independent individuals, and this individual is the world's most complex and varied species! [teeth bared] [teeth bared] [adoration] [adoration] [face covered] [face covered] [face covered
What do you think about the public opinion that says: low quality marriage is better than high quality solitude, but senior singles will slowly become a social problem?
01
Low-quality marriagesThe less you lose yourself, the more you live, the more you suffer, the whole life no longer have any pursuit and meaning, only the torture that must be endured every day;
The heaviest case is that you lose your life and do not know how to die, leaving your relatives to grieve, and similar news is endless, do not pretend not to see.
Quality solitudeIt's that you have solid financial means, a rich spiritual world, a strong spiritual garden, and don't depend on others or live for others.
You can take care of the soldiering on your own and bear the unspeakable weight of life, however comfortably you can.

In contrast, a low-quality marriage is all about depleting your self-worth, while high-quality solitude reaps the rewards of a future that you call your own.
Of course, a low quality marriage is better than a high quality solo life, so be sure to choose carefully.
02
Is the fact that old age singles are slowly becoming a social problem, meaning that if they are single and grow old, they have no children and therefore no one to support them and no place to go.
Honestly, even if you get married and have kids, do you have to keep the TA by your side and have to let it serve you until the day you die. It's too selfish to do that.

At most, the TA will come back from overseas to do a little filial piety when you are dying, instead of breaking the TA's wings alive.
With the degree of social civilization is getting higher and higher, the life of the elderly is also getting richer and richer, even if you live alone to seventy years old and eighty years old when no one to take care of, as long as you earn enough wealth in the early stage, make friends with a broad enough, to be honest, we are about to go to a high-grade nursing home to spend their twilight years together, what's the point of not doing it.
Therefore, this phenomenon should not be regarded as a social problem. Rather, it is a matter of early planning when one is young so that one can face it frankly when one is old.
The epidemic is changing every day, and to be able to sit at home and write in peace is the full weight of the white-coated angels fighting at the forefront of epidemic prevention. I am grateful and wish you peace.
Good afternoon.@Lonely
Insight into human nature to properly unlock the true meaning of love and marriage. You are welcome to come to me with your emotional problems or stories.
Not to mention the fact that singletons in their senior years will become a social problem, even senior citizens with children will become a social problem.
This question and answer are from the site users, does not represent the position of the site, such as infringement, please contact the administrator to delete.