Three monks without water vs. three people with no water vs. three people with no water! These are two very different concepts that are not even remotely related!

The fact that three monks have no water to drink reveals the true nature of human nature, which is to say that human nature is not good but evil. Even the Buddhists, who save all living beings, are afraid of suffering and do not want to give to others, but only want to profit from it themselves!

If three people are traveling together, there must be a teacher for me. Is to teach people, people should be modest, not arrogant, no matter you are powerful and noble sages, or commoners and lowly people, all have strengths and weaknesses, to put down the frame of mind to learn from the strengths of others in order to make up for the shortcomings of their own shortcomings!

Three monks have no water to drink and three people must be my teacher, are two different concepts of words and phrases, three monks have no water to drink means to do a Roppongi, more people, responsibility is not strong, can not be united like a person, three people must be my teacher means to do a thing, more people, learn from each other in the place of the party is also a lot of each of their own characteristics! It is worthwhile to learn from, both sentences contain profound philosophy.

Agree with you! A good man has three helpers, and all row the oars to sail a big boat. Only among the selfish and sneaky people will there be such a phenomenon as three monks having no water to drink.

Thanks for the invitation.

'Three monks have no water to drink' is not part of the same concept as 'three people must have a teacher'.

First of all: 'three monks have no water to drink' is because three monks live together, three people compare each other, there is a common mind, anyway, not I live alone, can not drink the water is not a person thirsty, and all three people drink. Therefore, you don't carry water, I don't carry water, and he doesn't carry water, causing all three to be unconscious, so all three monks can't drink water.

I remember that year to live in group quarters, we are also three people to eat and drink together in the accommodation, at first people just divided into a dormitory when it can be, every day to drink hot water, can take the initiative to take the responsibility of water. Later gradually began to compare, are not happy to go to the water, slowly water is not on the drink, some prefer to go to the next dormitory to borrow water to drink, but also do not take the initiative to carry water to drink.

Through this incident to see, not only the three monks do not have water to drink, the same our normal people are the same with the monks do not have water to drink. Then both monks and normal people, if they get together and Lei Feng, or to develop a rule, take turns to carry water, why worry about the end of no water to drink it, but also upset the mood of the three people unhappy.

'Three people must be my teacher' this sentence is not just a modest words, and very accurate, the ancients can summarize such a sentence has its own reasons. Who can not guarantee that they are knowledgeable, no one can reach, the so-called 'people outside the people, outside the sky' is so, do things humbly for the top, don't put themselves on the list of the heavenly heights of the party as a person's own. I don't know if what I shared is correct, welcome to leave a comment.

I'm Farmer Hungry, thanks for following.

In fact, all right, anything has its two sides, more people have more benefits, but there are also unsatisfactory places, as the saying goes, more people do not have the same heart, there are people say, more people, more power, more people, more ideas, said all good, mainly how do we look at it, or what attitude towards the problem, if it is to work together in a correct way to take the initiative to face everything to eliminate that kind of waiting for lazy people to want to Ideas, then the number of people does not exist, we say is not this reason.

Not the same thing.

My view is that the three walk with three monks have no water to drink, is a different logic of thinking; three walk, is a companion, talk to each other ...... can say nothing; three monks have no water to drink, is to pay the physical strength, will have water to drink, only to lead to this mutual shirking of responsibilities and pulling the wool over the eyes of each other, and finally have no water to drink in the Fable to show the future generations! .

These are two completely different concepts, the former are not willing to labor, one by one. The latter is the consideration of wisdom.

The culture is just rich, and all of them are beautiful words that guide people to do good.

Talk is better than action!