Repaying bad with good is at least a case of right and wrong, or even encouraging bad people to do bad things because instead of being punished, he is rewarded with good, so why not stick to bad things?

The Czechs, whom we should not have assisted, just shipped 30 million masks from our country this time, and the country immediately looted our expatriates' warehouses of masks and the like. Are they grateful? They don't have a culture of gratitude, only the law of the forest. It is foolish to imagine that others will do the same with their own style of work, way of thinking, and values.

The essence of repaying kindness with kindness is brain-deadness! Woe to the self, let people laugh.

Hurry up and throw away this feudal dross from a thousand years ago.

Virtue for Virtue is a shibboleth for the weak.

There are always some people who say that repaying kindness with kindness is generous and is a great style. In fact, there is one kind of people who have bad intentions and use "repaying kindness with kindness" to fool others in order to realize their own ulterior motives; and there is another kind of people who use "repaying kindness with kindness" to cover up their own tenderness and weakness. Another kind of person is the "Kong Yi Ji" who covers up his weakness by "returning kindness for hatred". I do not know whether the strongest people have ever repaid their grudges with benevolence. Has the United States appeased Osama bin Laden? Has Russia tolerated Turkey? The strong advocate repaying kindness with kindness, the robbers advocate repaying kindness with kindness, and only the weak will repay kindness with kindness. Typical of the bane of "Confucianism".

"Anyone who offends me in China will be executed even though he is far away." It is only when this saying is truly realized that one is king and strong.

It is not worthwhile to advocate the repayment of grudges with virtues, because the repayment of grudges with virtues makes it impossible to encourage good people to do good things and impossible to punish bad people for doing bad things, and without a standard for doing things, how can we promote the good and suppress the evil?

Repaying kindness with kindness is not worth advocating because it encourages villainous speculation and taking advantage of people's goodness to achieve ulterior motives.

Repaying grudges with kindness is not worth advocating, but also because once it is regarded as a virtue of being a human being, some people, in order to prove their magnanimity, will inevitably force themselves to suppress their inner dissatisfaction, and do things against their will, and their hearts and mouths, which is harmful to their physical and mental health, as well as covering up the truth of the matter.

In short, repaying kindness with kindness is a virtue, but it is not worth promoting. To our dear friends, we should return the favor; to those who have hurt us, although we do not need to be vindictive, at least we should dilute the detachment, to do the heart. Repaying kindness with kindness is a sign of hypocrisy and an enabler. Life is short, time is limited, love the people we should love, do not waste time on rotten people rotten things, used in useless work.

News like this has been in the press time and time again about 'repaying kindness with kindness″″. To be honest, it is really disgusting. I remember when we had a serious epidemic, apart from a few countries that gave material and moral assistance, there were also some countries that tried to malign China and called on China to apologize to the world! And now they are giving them free aid, what's the idea? Forget what the old song says?' Friends come with good sprinkles, if that jackal comes, he will be greeted with a shotgun″. If you repay kindness with kindness, then what will you do with kindness? This kind of universal grace not only can't win the pro-beauty and evil in the moving, but also hurt the good heart of friends, the loss is not worth it. The only way is to use violence to curb evil to repay good with virtue.

Repaying a grudge with a straight face. --- The Analects of Confucius

If you return a grudge with a virtue, can you be good? --- Tao Te Ching

The idea of "repaying kindness with kindness" is hypocrisy, and Chinese culture has the utmost contempt for it. Anyone who advocates "repaying grudges with virtue" is a hypocrite! The gods and the people are outraged! "Paying back grudges with kindness" is not Chinese culture. It is the dregs of Chinese culture, which is firmly opposed to it!

Once upon a time, there is a woman and a rich neighbor, because of land disputes, the rich killed her husband, the woman wanted to let people see themselves as "tolerance, generosity, and goodwill," the glorious image of forgiveness of the rich, the rich more arrogant. Later, the rich man's wife gave birth to a child without milk, the child is about to starve to death, to find also in the lactation period of the woman, her family advised her to leave it alone, this is the God's retribution for the rich man, she did not listen to, said that we should be "repaying grudges with benevolence," and so, fed the rich man's children, but starved to death of their own sons ... ... ...In the face of this woman, I don't know what the noble people think, anyway, I am quite disgusted.

That's because you simply don't understand the meaning of this sentence, which is from the Analects of Confucius - Xianqian (宪问), the original text of which reads, 'Or he said, "What is it like to repay a grudge with virtue?"' Zi said, "What is it like to repay a grudge with virtue? To repay grudges with straightness, and to repay virtues with virtues." ' Translated, this means, 'Someone said, "How about repaying evil deeds with good deeds?" Confucius said, "Repay good deeds with what? Reward evil deeds with justice, and good deeds with good deeds."' It can be seen that Confucius did not favor the practice of repaying evil with virtue, but put forward the idea of repaying evil with righteousness. Repaying evil with righteousness is different from repaying evil with hatred, that is to say, if you hit me, I am not hitting you in turn, so that I also become a bad person like you, I choose to let you be sanctioned through the proper means of law, which is precisely the spirit of the rule of law that is advocated by our society. Ignorance of traditional culture has led to countless misunderstandings of ancient culture, which is a very sad thing.

Returning kindness for kindness is the phrase that has the least sense of right and wrong. Those who agree with this phrase are either born masochists or profit mongers who hope that when they do something bad, not only will they not hold a grudge, but they will also be nice to them. If a society advocates repaying grudges with kindness, it is definitely the fall of justice and the beginning of moral collapse, because all people who have done bad things to others can say to others: you have to be generous, to repay grudges with kindness, don't be small-minded and calculating. Anyway, if you do bad things and don't have to be punished, then everyone will fight to be a bully, and the law will be useless, because even if you kill someone, you can still say that you have to repay the grudge with kindness.

The phrase "repaying kindness with kindness" is not an exhortation to give candy to someone who has been slapped in the face. The phrase actually describes the helplessness of the weak.

In a society where the law of the jungle prevails, the disadvantaged are always at the mercy of others and are powerless to fight back. After being bullied by the wicked, they can only swallow their anger and even have to curry favor with the wicked to avoid being bullied again. This is why there is the case of "repaying kindness with kindness".

"Returning kindness for kindness" is not a kind of generosity, a virtue, but rather an indulgence and support for evil forces, and it is not an exaggeration to say that it is disgusting behavior. It is not too much to say that it is a disgusting behavior. A person who is more tolerant and generous will never try to please the person who bullied him. Even Confucius was not in favor of "repaying grudges with kindness", so you can imagine how disgusting "repaying grudges with kindness" is.

Returning kindness with kindness is when someone slaps you in the face and you immediately cup the other person's palm and blow and caress it.

If you have the power to decide whether the other person lives or dies and you do so on purpose, you have a big heart and are a big man.

If you are equal opponents with your opponent but act in such a way, it is a sign of weakness, which will only make your opponent and outsiders despise you even more, and everyone will be even more reckless with you in the future.