Is it better for people to take turns retiring to their children's homes when they get old, or is it better for children to take turns spending time with the elderly?
Is it better for people to take turns retiring to their children's homes when they get old, or is it better for children to take turns spending time with the elderly?
People are old, each has its own way of living, who can not guess what others think, they know how they think on the line!
I'm in favor of the latter.
In families with many children, especially in rural areas. People in their old age take turns going to their children's homes for food and shelter. The advantage is that it is convenient for the children.
In the city wheeling the elderly to their children's homes in old age is less, most of them are on the senior citizen apartments, children share the money.
The disadvantages of rotating the elderly to their children's homes are.
1, some of them are changed in 1 month, which is too short a period of time. I didn't wait to stay in a familiar place and then change to another one.
2, there are catty, not even 1 day difference. No matter what the situation is, the elderly must go to the number. The elderly are kicked around like a soccer ball. What about dignity?
3, between children close to can, such as far away, the elderly also have to endure the pain of the car, tossing suffering, increase the chances of disease.
4, the elderly to the children's home, that is someone else's home, the heart is not solid.
For this reason, I am not in favour of the former, that is, the elderly taking turns to retire at their children's homes.
I'm in favor of seniors aging in their own homes, with children taking turns serving.
The reasons are.
1, the elderly live in their own homes, the environment is familiar and conducive to sleep.
2. Elderly people live in their own house, their own home. It eliminates the need to go to other people's homes.
3. Children take turns coming to the old people's homes to serve them, and the old people have a sense of ownership.
Don't think so much, when you can't take care of yourself, you'd better choose two ways, one is to hire a nurse to take care of you, the other is to go into a home for the elderly, you want your children to take turns to accompany you, you don't want those good things!
In your "life can still take care of themselves" I personally do not favor this "rotation system", to maintain their own life "space", respect for the children's living space, is really a "good, good, good", distance produces beauty, distance can make the family more attractive, the longer the sense of happiness. "Hello, I am good, everyone is good", distance produces beauty, distance can make affection more attractive, the longer the sense of well-being, when you "live on their own difficulties", then "rely on, dependence on When you have difficulty in taking care of yourself, then "dependence and reliance" has become "the only choice", and at this time, "the watchfulness of the leaf over the root" is a kind of "responsibility".
A: In life, the sons and daughters of most families bring their parents to live in their own homes, which saves them from traveling back and forth and allows them to do some housework at home.
There are many sons and daughters, so they can take turns to support the elderly, which is both fair and reasonable. When they meet filial sons and daughters, they can live a few more years by serving their parents thoughtfully, and when they meet unfilial sons and daughters who serve them, their parents will leave a little faster.
It is not necessary to have many sons and daughters; it is enough to have one who is filial. It is true that parents are pitiful in their old age, but unfilial sons and daughters will make them even more pitiful.
If the parents are rich parents, the children will scramble to support them, but if the parents are old and have no money, the only thing that awaits them is a miserable old age.

The question of the subject really belongs to the category of - the ideal is very rich, the reality is very bone dry ah!
The questioner asks: Is it better to take turns to retire to the children's homes in old age, or is it better for the children to take turns to spend time with the elderly?
1. In order to realize the proposition of the questioner, first the elderly must have more than two children.
But but but but, the gradually aging 60s met the one-child era, so most of them only had one child.
It's not their turn to have two kids.
2. Even if the elderly have two children, it is still difficult for them to realize the concept of "going to their children's homes to spend their old age or their children taking turns to accompany the elderly".It's huge.
Go to your children's homes to retire:
Can a house hold three generations in the age of inches? Of course it could be four generations.
By the way, the couple has four elderly people!
Nestled in a snail's nest, sure it's retirement? Won't family conflicts break out?
The children take turns going to the old man's house to keep him company:
With the elderly and the young, do they really not need to work for the generation in the middle?
Even after retirement, are they really blessed with such good fortune that they don't need to take care of the next generation?
So as a prospective senior citizen with only one child, the two retirement methods of the subject are truly unattainable!
So from now on, when they're healthy, the two of them depend on each other.
Nursing homes or hospitals when we need care, that's the right choice for us ah!
In my humble opinion, this is for reference only. Good luck to all the elderly in their old age.
I'm Rose Chang, a nagging housewife from medicine.
If you like me, you can follow me and listen to my worldly stories and share life lessons every day.
Go to a nursing home on your own when you're old, don't drag your kids down, and although you may feel lonely, at least don't let your family feel like a burden.
Still live on my own, the kids each have their own thing going on, and they would be content to visit once or twice a week if they have the time. Thank you!
This situation is best for the wishes of the elderly to prevail, the elderly are willing to take turns to accompany their children in turn, willing to take turns to go to their children's homes, depending on the circumstances of each family, some families have special circumstances, according to their own family, as long as filial piety elderly people will be very happy!
You'll take your turn with more kids. And the lesser? That's him. If you have your own retirement money, go to a nursing home! I'm going anyway.
This question and answer are from the site users, does not represent the position of the site, such as infringement, please contact the administrator to delete.