If the Literature Examination can cure the disease, of course the Literature Examination is better. If the Literature Examination cannot cure the disease, naturally the actual examination is better. It's very objective.

You don't have to take the test. Just go with the flow.

By literature examination do you mean institutional TCM education? By actual examination, do you mean teacher training or confirmed specialization?

If you want to engage in Chinese medicine research in the future, you will definitely need institutional education. If the future of Chinese medicine clinical, it also depends on the future into the hospital or in the private sector, if you want to enter the hospital in the future, or institutional education, or even to read the master's degree; if you want to practice medicine in the private sector in the future, it is necessary to combine the two, the first formal 5-year education, lay a solid foundation, and then more teachers, more clinical, after all, folk Chinese medicine is mainly based on the efficacy of the treatment.

Of course, Chinese medicine practitioners have to take examinations on the theory and practical operation of Chinese medicine! Arts in the good on the Chinese medicine know nothing about it and what is the use. Chinese medicine doctors talk about the heart of the doctor. Where the medical practitioner medical ethics and medical style is also the most important.

Only allowed academics, and traditional Chinese medicine practitioners want to assess, not to spend 20,000 yuan, enrollment is not part of the unlicensed practice of medicine heart entangled, and can cure the disease on the line. This is not disturbed in the safety issue of law enforcement, humble heart self-preservation, abandon the meritocracy, more can force the safety and efficacy of the solid. Into the institution, the walking dead. Unless Zhang Zhongjing convicted, and then the traditional Chinese medicine practitioners practicing without a license to come to a universal manhunt, that is the home of delusional Chinese medicine.

Chinese medicine study is about enlightenment. So no essay exam or actual exam are good. The literature examination carries on a systematic study, the actual examination directly into the actual combat, as for the literature is better or the actual examination is better? The main thing is to look at your current situation. If you are suitable for the literature examination. Then you take the door examination this way for systematic study. If the conditions are not allowed, and you are particularly fond of Chinese medicine. Then you can also take the actual exam.

Traditional medicine, of course, is a good Wenkao, our motherland medicine is profound, carry forward the need for a deep cultural heritage .......

The rationale should be practical assessment. The treatment method of Chinese medicine is dialectical treatment, combining internal and external treatment. Among them, the four diagnoses: looking, smelling, questioning and cutting, are the key to the dialectic and require a combination of rich practical experience and theoretical knowledge in order to achieve good healing results.

Whether it's Chinese or Western medicine, it's always best to treat on the spot to see the results, because doctors treat people, not answer papers. While the vast majority of people will find what I'm saying reasonable, it's basically not going to be a reality. One can only say it is a pity!

Chinese medicine practitioners of course have to take the literature examination as the mainstay. The students of the University of Traditional Chinese Medicine have to pass a lot of the first line in the examination. After 5 to 6 years of study to be considered as a beginner, relying on a particular experience without theoretical support is not able to withstand scrutiny and repeated research and evidence. Chinese medicine is a study, and is a profound study. Only after formal theoretical education can one be qualified to practice medicine. Relying on the so-called partial prescription or technique, no big data, it can only be considered experience. It cannot be considered as theory, not to mention science.