The purpose of a property owner is to make money! He has no obligation to serve the residents. It's evident through this big national epidemic. The community walks the streets with great concern! And the property owners just give a notice. He doesn't care who needs help! So I suggest again! Cancel the property. Properties under the management of the community. Charge for the cost! Strengthen the ties between residents and the community! Reflect the care and concern of our grass-roots party branches for the residents of the community! Make our residents love our country more! Love the Party! More stable society. Harmony! Also eliminated the possible development of triad nature of the group! [Praise]

When the owners' committee organizes the owners to vote on the service of the property company to measure the satisfaction, it means that the property service has problems, to the point of termination, the committee can terminate the contract according to the results of the vote. At present, most of the property companies to maximize profits in the first place, service standards, quality of the second, there are personnel without training on the job, poor business quality problems, property disputes are increasing dramatically. The way to resolve conflicts is the property services to the community, government organizations, owners pay, remove the company in the middle for profit. In this way, the rights and interests of employees engaged in property services to protect, the government to solve unemployment, the rights and interests of owners are also protected. Conflicts can be resolved to a great extent.

Residents vote on property satisfaction, how about canceling the property if you don't pass the test? Good question, first watchman, why is the property unqualified? According to my personal survey, there are the following points.

1, the origin and tenure of the property owner, they are all first class protected animals with special connections and backstage protection, not easy to change the social herd.

2. Her and their organizations, is the native system, serving only relatives. There is not much sense of service, night and day.

3, he they bottom employees, do not get any protection, slave work, have no place to tell their opinions, tell useless, so can only listen to it. Can not do not walk away from the idea.

Several of the above situations cause owners to be dissatisfied with their properties. That is, the beginning of the conflict.

Now the owners and property disputes the main responsibility in the property, many property companies do not have the correct position of a service company into the nature of the management of the nature of the assessment of the main purpose is to correct the property in the service of the problems that exist in the property, it is very necessary to assess the results of each time to report to the Housing and Urban-Residential Development Bureau and the Community Council back case.

Some properties really don't work, it seems like our property didn't have any other local properties doing anything during this outbreak, I'm in favor of eliminating the

Now the property company lacks regulation, some property companies is a triad epitome, the so-called owners' committee is virtually non-existent, the property company takes the owner's money, originally for the owners of the service, but the property anti-client, take the owner's money to do let the owners of the chilling things ......

It is absolutely undesirable. The residents are not that highly qualified, and it is impossible for them to vote impartially under the lure of favors, which will only encourage a crooked culture.

This approach seems reasonable, but is not practically feasible!

First of all, what does it mean to be qualified and is there a workable measure? Has everyone (owners and property owners) confirmed this? Otherwise it's a joke if you go by personal intuition!

Plus satisfaction assessment, too many personal subjective factors, personal good and bad emotional factors! Based on this basis, qualified is always said to be unqualified! Property or residents, are not suitable as a referee, both sides are in the middle, for the contradictory party!

So, I don't think it's feasible! There should be an itemized inspection by a third party with no conflict of interest, based on criteria mutually determined by both parties! Based on the results of the inspection, the percentage of property fee payment should be decided!

The property is a company, the vote is unreasonable, the service service scoring system, up to standard or not will know!

This dissatisfaction and failure cannot determine whether the preexisting property company must be eliminated.

Before it can be canceled, there has to be a decision on who will take over before it can be canceled. That is to say, who is specifically in overall charge after the cancellation, and who is responsible for the handover procedures with the canceled property?

There is no way the government would agree to leave the neighborhood in an unmanaged paralyzed state without a receiver.

At that time, the elevator stops running, no one cleans up the garbage, the building lighting does not turn on, and what about random parking in the community's fire lanes?