I like both of them, they feel about the same.

A grade, all like it.

These two works are meant to be in Wang Duo's brushwork, and in general the chapter style of the second one is better than that of the first one.

For one thing, the two pieces are not quite right in terms of penmanship.

When copying Wang Duo, you should observe the starting line and ending line of his brush.

Wang Duo's starting strokes like to pause first, then adjust to a medium stroke before running.

And you have more starting strokes that go smoothly into the paper.

Wang Duo's strokes are often accompanied by lifting and pressing motions, so that the gestures of the lines are richer and more flavorful.

Your linework is still slightly monotonous, and the gestures of the lines are not full-bodied enough.

The picture above is one that I meant to prose, and it's not well done in terms of detail.

Two, you could also do with a little more exaggeration in the word conjugation.

Some of the characters are not handled well enough in terms of conjugation, such as the fine character in line 2 and the red character in line 3, two characters next to each other that are too similar in terms of character styling.

Third, it's generally pretty good in terms of chapter organization.

The thickness of the lines, the thickness of the ink, and the blockage of the air opening are not bad. But it can be made richer.

The original of this piece was supposed to be hand-scrolled, and you're being creative by changing it to a scroll.

But Wang Duo's hand scrolls and vertical scrolls are two different types of styles. There are different patterns in the breakup of characters, the arrangement of character groups, and the layout of chapters.

For example, Wang Duo's vertical scroll, that kind of line winding, that kind of line swing in the hand scroll is not obvious, which should be well grasped in the prose.

Overall the writing felt pretty good.

The first has no soul, the second has a soul, but the connotation or connotation is not enough, although the line is smooth, always feel floating some. Word such as their people is not false, skillful techniques, such as the bottom of the vicissitudes of experience is not to write a shocking feeling. Write really good, keep up the good work.

I like the first one better.

I like the first one, the strength of the strokes is a bit solid, the second one is a bit more floating and weak. Cursive writing is a stormy, heavy strokes such as copper hammer, strokes as light as silk but the strength is still in the can not be frivolous.

Both are almost fine!

Love the first one, the colors of the image are harmonious.

The first painting is more expressive overall, with better ink color matching and more refined dots and strokes. There is subtlety in the wildness, and the lines are cleaner and more condensed in the rapidity of the strokes.

A: Characters and paintings can be words in people, words in the heart, words in the nature, words in the nurture, words in the virtue! But I don't know much about it, but I appreciate it now, learning...!